FJUN vs. KNG
FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) and KNG (FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FJUN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FJUN returned 11.05%/yr vs 4.31%/yr for KNG. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FJUN charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
FJUN vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.
FJUN
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 4.64%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 13.82%
- 3Y*
- 14.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
FJUN vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 4.64% | 11.05% | 16.38% | 22.30% | -4.95% | 11.47% | 11.67% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 2.20% | 6.63% | 5.99% | 7.48% | -7.03% | 24.78% | 19.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between FJUN and KNG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FJUN and KNG has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FJUN vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FJUN
KNG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FJUN
KNG
Financial Services
FJUN
KNG
Communication Services
FJUN
KNG
-
Consumer Cyclical
FJUN
KNG
Healthcare
FJUN
KNG
Industrials
FJUN
KNG
Consumer Defensive
FJUN
KNG
Energy
FJUN
KNG
Utilities
FJUN
KNG
Real Estate
FJUN
KNG
Basic Materials
FJUN
KNG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FJUN vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
FJUN
KNG
FJUN vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FJUN | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.13 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 0.87 | +2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.98 | 2.25 | +16.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FJUN | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 0.73 | +1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.32 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.49 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
FJUN vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJUN | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -35.12% | +21.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.13% | -8.61% | +4.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.26% | -14.24% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.26% | -18.20% | +4.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.18% | -5.89% | +5.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -4.13% | +2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 3.32% | -2.59% |
Volatility
FJUN vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is 0.41%, while FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) has a volatility of 2.29%. This indicates that FJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FJUN | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | 2.29% | -1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.35% | 7.39% | -3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.11% | 10.19% | -4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.55% | 13.59% | -3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.27% | 17.18% | -6.91% |
FJUN vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FJUN vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.67% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FJUN and KNG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KNG has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to FJUN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUN dropped -13.26% vs KNG's -35.12%.
On 5-year performance, FJUN leads with 11.05% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FJUN has performed better with a 11.05% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.
KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.
FJUN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while KNG is Dividend. FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUN and 0.75% for KNG.
FJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FJUN and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer