PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJUN vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJUN vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJUN achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


FJUN

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.03%
YTD
4.64%
6M
5.30%
1Y
13.82%
3Y*
14.38%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJUN vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June
4.64%11.05%16.38%22.30%-4.95%11.47%11.67%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%19.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FJUN and KNG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between FJUN and KNG has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FJUN vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FJUN
KNG

Technology

36.2%
4.3%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.7%

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
5.5%

Healthcare

8.4%
10.1%

Industrials

8.1%
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
23.5%

Energy

3.5%
3.0%

Utilities

2.3%
6.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
4.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
10.2%

Technology

FJUN
36.2%
KNG
4.3%

Financial Services

FJUN
11.9%
KNG
12.7%

Communication Services

FJUN
10.9%
KNG

-

Consumer Cyclical

FJUN
10.1%
KNG
5.5%

Healthcare

FJUN
8.4%
KNG
10.1%

Industrials

FJUN
8.1%
KNG
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

FJUN
4.9%
KNG
23.5%

Energy

FJUN
3.5%
KNG
3.0%

Utilities

FJUN
2.3%
KNG
6.1%

Real Estate

FJUN
1.9%
KNG
4.4%

Basic Materials

FJUN
1.8%
KNG
10.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJUN vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJUN
FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJUN vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FJUNKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.13

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

0.87

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.98

2.25

+16.73

FJUN vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJUN and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FJUNKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

0.73

+1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.32

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.49

+0.68

Drawdowns

FJUN vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJUN drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJUN and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJUNKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-35.12%

+21.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.13%

-8.61%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.26%

-14.24%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.26%

-18.20%

+4.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-5.89%

+5.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-4.13%

+2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

3.32%

-2.59%

Volatility

FJUN vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) is 0.41%, while FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) has a volatility of 2.29%. This indicates that FJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJUNKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

2.29%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.35%

7.39%

-3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

10.19%

-4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.55%

13.59%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.27%

17.18%

-6.91%

FJUN vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJUN vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FJUN and KNG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNG has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to FJUN (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJUN dropped -13.26% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, FJUN leads with 11.05% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FJUN has performed better with a 11.05% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.

FJUN is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while KNG is Dividend. FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FJUN and 0.75% for KNG.

FJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJUN and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer