FJMNX vs. QQQX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FJMNX (Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund) and QQQX (Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund) are both mutual funds - FJMNX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Nuveen, while QQQX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq 100 Index. Over the past 10 years, FJMNX returned 1.92%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for QQQX. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. FJMNX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for QQQX.

Performance

FJMNX vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund (FJMNX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJMNX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than QQQX's 11.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FJMNX has underperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 1.92%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.

FJMNX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 7.13%
• 3Y*: 3.61%
• 5Y*: 0.68%
• 10Y*: 1.92%

QQQX

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 11.82%
• 6M: 15.23%
• 1Y: 33.66%
• 3Y*: 16.49%
• 5Y*: 9.58%
• 10Y*: 13.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJMNX vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FJMNX Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund	1.43%	3.40%	2.66%	5.40%	-9.58%	1.55%	4.02%	7.92%	0.38%	6.45%
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	11.82%	14.87%	25.61%	21.68%	-27.39%	25.32%	15.75%	28.83%	-11.68%	39.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FJMNX and QQQX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007	-0.06

The correlation between FJMNX and QQQX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FJMNX vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJMNX

FJMNX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FJMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FJMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
FJMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FJMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FJMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

QQQX

QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 71
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJMNX vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund (FJMNX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FJMNX	QQQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	2.30	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.40	3.33	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	1.43	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	3.71	-0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.49	17.36	-7.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FJMNX vs. QQQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJMNX and QQQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FJMNX	QQQX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.74	2.30	+0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.49	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	0.64	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.48	+0.40

Drawdowns

FJMNX vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJMNX drawdown since its inception was -17.21%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJMNX and QQQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJMNX	QQQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.21%	-57.25%	+40.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.49%	-9.11%	+6.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.93%	-22.80%	+15.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.28%	-29.33%	+14.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-15.28%	-35.96%	+20.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-1.76%	+1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.40%	-8.02%	+5.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.74%	1.94%	-1.20%

Volatility

FJMNX vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund (FJMNX) is 1.04%, while Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that FJMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJMNX	QQQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.04%	4.28%	-3.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.88%	11.57%	-9.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60%	14.69%	-12.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.09%	19.82%	-15.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.18%	21.07%	-16.89%

FJMNX vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJMNX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQX's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJMNX vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

FJMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than QQQX's 7.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FJMNX Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund	3.16%	3.47%	3.56%	3.24%	2.83%	1.78%	2.49%	3.23%	3.14%	3.19%	3.42%	3.63%
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	7.36%	7.85%	6.73%	7.26%	9.66%	5.85%	6.00%	6.49%	8.40%	5.95%	7.54%	7.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJMNX and QQQX in my portfolio?

FJMNX and QQQX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FJMNX or QQQX?

QQQX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to FJMNX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJMNX dropped -17.21% vs QQQX's -57.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FJMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.