PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FJMNX vs. DODIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FJMNX vs. DODIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund (FJMNX) and Dodge & Cox Income Fund (DODIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FJMNX achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than DODIX's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FJMNX has underperformed DODIX with an annualized return of 1.87%, while DODIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.88% annualized return.


FJMNX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.60%
YTD
1.62%
6M
2.01%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
1.87%

DODIX

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.59%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
2.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJMNX vs. DODIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FJMNX
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund
1.62%3.40%2.66%5.40%-9.58%1.55%4.02%7.92%0.38%6.45%
DODIX
Dodge & Cox Income Fund
0.43%8.32%2.25%7.69%-11.42%-0.92%9.46%9.73%-0.31%4.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FJMNX and DODIX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1988

0.52

The correlation between FJMNX and DODIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FJMNX vs. DODIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJMNX
FJMNX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FJMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FJMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

DODIX
DODIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DODIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DODIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
DODIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DODIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
DODIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJMNX vs. DODIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund (FJMNX) and Dodge & Cox Income Fund (DODIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FJMNXDODIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.25

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.74

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.16

4.97

+4.19

FJMNX vs. DODIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJMNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the DODIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJMNX and DODIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FJMNX vs. DODIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJMNX drawdown since its inception was -17.21%, roughly equal to the maximum DODIX drawdown of -16.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJMNX and DODIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FJMNXDODIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.21%

-16.89%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-3.17%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.93%

-5.68%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.28%

-16.89%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.28%

-16.89%

+1.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-1.71%

+1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-1.50%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

1.11%

-0.36%

Volatility

FJMNX vs. DODIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund (FJMNX) is 0.70%, while Dodge & Cox Income Fund (DODIX) has a volatility of 1.11%. This indicates that FJMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DODIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FJMNXDODIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

1.11%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

3.07%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54%

4.06%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.09%

5.57%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.18%

4.46%

-0.28%

FJMNX vs. DODIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJMNX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than DODIX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

FJMNX vs. DODIX - Dividend Comparison

FJMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than DODIX's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DODIX
Dodge & Cox Income Fund
4.26%4.23%4.24%3.86%2.19%3.23%4.66%3.63%3.43%3.03%3.25%3.09%
FJMNX
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund
3.15%3.47%3.56%3.24%2.83%1.78%2.49%3.23%3.14%3.19%3.42%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FJMNX and DODIX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DODIX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to FJMNX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJMNX dropped -17.21% vs DODIX's -16.89%.

FJMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FJMNX and DODIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer