FJMNX vs. SVBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund (FJMNX) and John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX).
FJMNX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Jul 10, 1988. SVBAX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 4, 1992.
Performance
FJMNX vs. SVBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FJMNX vs. SVBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJMNX Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund | 0.03% | 3.40% | 2.66% | 5.40% | -9.58% | 1.55% | 4.02% | 7.92% | 0.38% | 6.45% |
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund | -0.63% | 15.69% | 13.31% | 18.22% | -15.79% | 14.49% | 15.97% | 21.28% | -5.02% | 13.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FJMNX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly higher than SVBAX's -0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, FJMNX has underperformed SVBAX with an annualized return of 1.90%, while SVBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.13% annualized return.
FJMNX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.49%
- 3Y*
- 2.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
SVBAX
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- YTD
- -0.63%
- 6M
- 2.60%
- 1Y
- 16.62%
- 3Y*
- 13.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FJMNX vs. SVBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FJMNX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than SVBAX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FJMNX vs. SVBAX — Risk / Return Rank
FJMNX
SVBAX
FJMNX vs. SVBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund (FJMNX) and John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FJMNX | SVBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 1.54 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.08 | 2.23 | -1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.33 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 2.26 | -1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 11.04 | -8.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FJMNX | SVBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 1.54 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.71 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.85 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.68 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between FJMNX and SVBAX is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FJMNX vs. SVBAX - Dividend Comparison
FJMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than SVBAX's 12.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FJMNX Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund | 3.50% | 3.47% | 3.56% | 3.24% | 2.83% | 1.78% | 2.49% | 3.23% | 3.14% | 3.19% | 3.42% | 3.63% |
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund | 12.57% | 12.45% | 3.72% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 2.73% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 8.06% | 3.51% | 1.70% | 4.57% |
Drawdowns
FJMNX vs. SVBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FJMNX drawdown since its inception was -17.21%, smaller than the maximum SVBAX drawdown of -40.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJMNX and SVBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FJMNX | SVBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.21% | -40.81% | +23.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.94% | -7.73% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.28% | -20.53% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.28% | -21.00% | +5.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -3.68% | +1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -5.26% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 1.58% | +0.08% |
Volatility
FJMNX vs. SVBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond Fund (FJMNX) is 1.12%, while John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that FJMNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FJMNX | SVBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 3.92% | -2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.64% | 6.35% | -4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.99% | 11.22% | -6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 10.73% | -6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.18% | 10.76% | -6.58% |