FIYY vs. AMDW
FIYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FIYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.
Performance
FIYY vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FIYY
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW
- 1D
- -5.13%
- 1M
- -6.10%
- 6M
- 161.25%
- YTD
- 174.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIYY vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | -1.90% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 62.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIYY and AMDW is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIYY vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF (FIYY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIYY vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIYY drawdown since its inception was -2.42%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIYY and AMDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIYY | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -34.64% | +32.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -12.53% | +10.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -14.01% | +12.65% |
Volatility
FIYY vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIYY | AMDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.29% | 83.51% | -78.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.29% | 83.51% | -78.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.29% | 83.51% | -78.22% |
FIYY vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIYY vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison
FIYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than AMDW's 39.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 39.85% | 34.78% |
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | 1.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIYY and AMDW have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FIYY.
AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 39.85%, compared with 1.09% for FIYY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for FIYY and 0.99% for AMDW.
Find the right allocation for FIYY and AMDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer