FIXT vs. IFLR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FIXT (Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF) and IFLR (Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FIXT is passively managed, while IFLR is actively managed. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FIXT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for IFLR.

Performance

FIXT vs. IFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXT achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than IFLR's 7.99% return.

FIXT

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -0.88%
• 6M: -0.36%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 1Y: 2.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.01%

IFLR

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 3.22%
• YTD: 7.99%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	$753.53K	$1.08M	$852.15K
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF	$746.91K	$605.77K	$737.65K

FIXT vs. IFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	-0.02%	0.43%
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF	7.99%	3.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXT and IFLR is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

FIXT vs. IFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIXT

FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 27
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 26

IFLR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIXT vs. IFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF (IFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FIXT	IFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.12	—	—

Drawdowns

FIXT vs. IFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXT drawdown since its inception was -3.02%, smaller than the maximum IFLR drawdown of -9.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXT and IFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIXT	IFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	-9.58%	+6.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	0.00%	-2.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.84%	-2.52%	+1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.21%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FIXT	IFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58%	13.14%	-9.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.76%	13.14%	-9.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.76%	13.14%	-9.38%

FIXT vs. IFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIXT vs. IFLR - Dividend Comparison

FIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than IFLR's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
FIXT Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF	5.66%	3.24%
IFLR Innovator International Developed Managed Floor ETF	0.93%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIXT and IFLR in my portfolio?

FIXT and IFLR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FIXT or IFLR?

On fees, FIXT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FIXT or IFLR?

FIXT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for IFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FIXT or IFLR?

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.93% for IFLR.

What is the main difference between FIXT and IFLR?

They also come from different issuers: Procure and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FIXT and 0.89% for IFLR.