PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIXT vs. DGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIXT vs. DGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXT achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than DGT's 12.01% return.


FIXT

1D
0.24%
1M
-0.31%
6M
-0.01%
YTD
0.41%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGT

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.89%
6M
9.62%
YTD
12.01%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
20.52%
5Y*
14.17%
10Y*
13.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIXT vs. DGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FIXT and DGT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

0.39

FIXT vs. DGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIXT
DGT

Healthcare

100.0%
10.7%

Basic Materials

-

7.2%

Communication Services

-

5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.1%

Energy

-

6.3%

Financial Services

-

16.7%

Industrials

-

13.5%

Real Estate

-

1.4%

Technology

-

20.4%

Utilities

-

3.4%

Healthcare

FIXT
100.0%
DGT
10.7%

Basic Materials

FIXT

-

DGT
7.2%

Communication Services

FIXT

-

DGT
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FIXT

-

DGT
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

FIXT

-

DGT
7.1%

Energy

FIXT

-

DGT
6.3%

Financial Services

FIXT

-

DGT
16.7%

Industrials

FIXT

-

DGT
13.5%

Real Estate

FIXT

-

DGT
1.4%

Technology

FIXT

-

DGT
20.4%

Utilities

FIXT

-

DGT
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIXT vs. DGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIXT
FIXT Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

DGT
DGT Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIXT vs. DGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) and State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIXTDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

3.06

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.09

12.08

-7.99

FIXT vs. DGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the DGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXT and DGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIXT vs. DGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXT drawdown since its inception was -3.02%, smaller than the maximum DGT drawdown of -55.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXT and DGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXTDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.02%

-55.36%

+52.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-8.38%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-1.43%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-13.78%

+13.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

2.12%

-1.00%

Volatility

FIXT vs. DGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF (FIXT) is 1.02%, while State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that FIXT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXTDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

2.95%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.58%

10.35%

-7.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71%

12.44%

-8.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.75%

15.20%

-11.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.75%

16.78%

-13.03%

FIXT vs. DGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DGT's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIXT vs. DGT - Dividend Comparison

FIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than DGT's 2.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGT
State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF
2.51%2.78%2.83%2.53%3.15%2.66%1.97%2.76%2.50%1.93%2.31%2.37%
FIXT
Procure Disaster Recovery Strategy ETF
5.59%3.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIXT and DGT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGT has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to FIXT (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXT dropped -3.02% vs DGT's -55.36%.

On 1-year performance, DGT leads with 25.51% vs 4.56% for FIXT. On fees, DGT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FIXT has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DGT has performed better with a 25.51% return vs 4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FIXT.

FIXT has the higher dividend yield at 5.59%, compared with 2.51% for DGT.

FIXT tracks VettaFi Natural Disaster Response and Mitigation Index, while DGT tracks The Global Dow. They also come from different issuers: Procure and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FIXT and 0.50% for DGT.

DGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIXT and DGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer