PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIXRX vs. FRQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIXRX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund (FIXRX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXRX achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly higher than FRQHX's 3.71% return.


FIXRX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
4.52%
6M
4.60%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
10.08%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*
6.86%

FRQHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.66%
YTD
3.71%
6M
3.85%
1Y
9.62%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIXRX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FIXRX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund
4.52%13.42%6.56%11.83%-15.65%8.00%13.10%5.87%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.71%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXRX and FRQHX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FIXRX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIXRX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIXRX
FIXRX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FIXRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQHX
FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIXRX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund (FIXRX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIXRXFRQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.45

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.88

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.12

12.04

-0.93

FIXRX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FRQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXRX and FRQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIXRX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXRX drawdown since its inception was -41.29%, which is greater than FRQHX's maximum drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXRX and FRQHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXRXFRQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.29%

-16.90%

-24.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-3.41%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.24%

-5.15%

-2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

-16.90%

-4.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-0.41%

-1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-3.77%

-1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

0.81%

+0.38%

Volatility

FIXRX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund (FIXRX) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) at 2.04%. This indicates that FIXRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXRXFRQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

2.04%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.56%

3.70%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.61%

4.36%

+2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.21%

5.60%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.38%

5.77%

+2.61%

FIXRX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXRX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIXRX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

FIXRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than FRQHX's 3.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIXRX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund
3.67%2.67%2.59%2.44%4.74%5.12%3.58%3.87%7.10%24.84%2.44%4.49%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.40%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FIXRX and FRQHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIXRX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to FRQHX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXRX dropped -41.29% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.

FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIXRX and FRQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer