PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIXD vs. DBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIXD vs. DBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF (FIXD) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIXD achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly higher than DBND's -0.21% return.


FIXD

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.16%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
3.87%
5Y*
-0.35%
10Y*

DBND

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.03%
YTD
-0.21%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
4.85%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIXD vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FIXD
First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF
0.16%7.95%0.75%5.72%-8.07%
DBND
DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF
-0.21%7.41%3.06%6.33%-5.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FIXD and DBND is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022

0.92

The correlation between FIXD and DBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIXD vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIXD
FIXD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FIXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIXD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
FIXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIXD Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

DBND
DBND Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIXD vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF (FIXD) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIXDDBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.72

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

5.10

+0.17

FIXD vs. DBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIXD Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the DBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIXD and DBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIXDDBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.48

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.48

-0.13

Drawdowns

FIXD vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIXD drawdown since its inception was -20.44%, which is greater than DBND's maximum drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIXD and DBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXDDBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.44%

-9.39%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-2.83%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.97%

-6.25%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-1.80%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-2.27%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

0.95%

+0.12%

Volatility

FIXD vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF (FIXD) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND) at 1.07%. This indicates that FIXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXDDBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

1.07%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.13%

2.33%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.20%

3.30%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.58%

5.09%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.84%

5.09%

+0.75%

FIXD vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIXD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIXD vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison

FIXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than DBND's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBND
DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF
4.79%4.78%5.19%4.39%2.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIXD
First Trust Smith Opportunistic Fixed Income ETF
4.69%4.50%4.56%3.93%3.07%1.74%3.14%5.10%2.81%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FIXD and DBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIXD has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to DBND (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIXD dropped -20.44% vs DBND's -9.39%.

On 3-year performance, DBND leads with 4.50% vs 3.87% for FIXD. On fees, DBND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBND has performed better with a 4.50% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FIXD.

DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.69% for FIXD.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FIXD and 0.50% for DBND.

DBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIXD and DBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer