PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIX vs. CIFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FIX vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIX achieves a 98.62% return, which is significantly higher than CIFR's 64.57% return.


FIX

1D
0.44%
1M
-5.10%
YTD
98.62%
6M
87.34%
1Y
263.59%
3Y*
127.92%
5Y*
85.83%
10Y*
50.73%

CIFR

1D
8.20%
1M
18.20%
YTD
64.57%
6M
24.69%
1Y
522.82%
3Y*
119.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIX vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
98.62%120.86%106.89%79.62%16.98%30.91%
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
64.57%218.10%12.35%637.50%-87.90%-54.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FIX and CIFR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2021

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FIX:

$65.29B

CIFR:

$9.84B

EPS

FIX:

$34.64

CIFR:

-$2.33

PS Ratio

FIX:

6.45

CIFR:

53.38

PB Ratio

FIX:

23.19

CIFR:

13.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

FIX:

$10.14B

CIFR:

$174.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FIX:

$2.55B

CIFR:

-$172.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

FIX:

$1.70B

CIFR:

-$169.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIX vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIX
FIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CIFR
CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIX vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) and Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIXCIFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.45

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

19.28

10.27

+9.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

59.72

20.60

+39.12

FIX vs. CIFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIX Sharpe Ratio is 4.98, which is comparable to the CIFR Sharpe Ratio of 4.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIX and CIFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIXCIFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.98

4.86

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.94

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.16

+0.24

Drawdowns

FIX vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIX drawdown since its inception was -93.36%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIX and CIFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIXCIFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.36%

-97.16%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.77%

-51.38%

+37.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.05%

-71.74%

+25.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.28%

-7.61%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.08%

-66.47%

+28.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

25.55%

-21.09%

Volatility

FIX vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) is 12.60%, while Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) has a volatility of 27.70%. This indicates that FIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIXCIFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.60%

27.70%

-15.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.27%

70.95%

-33.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.46%

108.62%

-55.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.49%

122.03%

-77.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.35%

122.03%

-79.68%

Dividends

FIX vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison

FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while CIFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIX
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.14%0.21%0.28%0.41%0.49%0.49%0.81%0.79%0.76%0.68%0.83%0.88%

Financials

FIX vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Cipher Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
2.87B
0
(FIX) Total Revenue
(CIFR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FIX and CIFR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIFR has higher volatility (27.70%) compared to FIX (12.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIX dropped -93.36% vs CIFR's -97.16%.

FIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs 4.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIX and CIFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer