FIWGX vs. TIBDX
FIWGX (Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund) and TIBDX (TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, FIWGX returned -0.25%/yr vs -0.36%/yr for TIBDX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FIWGX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TIBDX.
Performance
FIWGX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIWGX achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly lower than TIBDX's -0.60% return.
FIWGX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- 6M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 1.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.46%
TIBDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- 2.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 1.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FIWGX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIWGX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund | -1.03% | 6.90% | 2.14% | 6.51% | -13.71% | -0.37% | 10.21% | 9.39% | 1.28% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | -0.60% | 7.38% | 1.95% | 5.63% | -13.68% | -0.95% | 8.10% | 9.57% | 2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIWGX and TIBDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FIWGX and TIBDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIWGX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank
FIWGX
TIBDX
FIWGX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIWGX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.14 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 0.98 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | 2.58 | -0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIWGX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIWGX drawdown since its inception was -18.42%, roughly equal to the maximum TIBDX drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWGX and TIBDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIWGX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.42% | -18.82% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.52% | -2.98% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.20% | -5.35% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.42% | -18.82% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -2.46% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -2.30% | -2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.13% | -0.18% |
Volatility
FIWGX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) at 0.88%. This indicates that FIWGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIWGX | TIBDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 0.88% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.79% | 3.01% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.92% | 3.76% | +0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 5.64% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.47% | 4.74% | +0.73% |
FIWGX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIWGX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIWGX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison
FIWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than TIBDX's 4.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIWGX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund | 3.11% | 3.68% | 4.36% | 3.79% | 2.24% | 1.77% | 6.83% | 4.30% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund | 4.16% | 4.34% | 3.60% | 3.22% | 2.44% | 2.39% | 4.45% | 3.09% | 2.88% | 2.93% | 3.80% | 4.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIWGX and TIBDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIWGX has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to TIBDX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWGX dropped -18.42% vs TIBDX's -18.82%.
TIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIWGX and TIBDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer