PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TIBDX vs. FCBYX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TIBDX and FCBYX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

TIBDX vs. FCBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) and Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%200.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
91.11%
203.97%
TIBDX
FCBYX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TIBDX:

0.75

FCBYX:

1.96

Sortino Ratio

TIBDX:

1.09

FCBYX:

3.02

Omega Ratio

TIBDX:

1.13

FCBYX:

1.38

Calmar Ratio

TIBDX:

0.30

FCBYX:

1.96

Martin Ratio

TIBDX:

2.06

FCBYX:

8.02

Ulcer Index

TIBDX:

1.85%

FCBYX:

0.90%

Daily Std Dev

TIBDX:

5.08%

FCBYX:

3.66%

Max Drawdown

TIBDX:

-19.54%

FCBYX:

-25.72%

Current Drawdown

TIBDX:

-7.23%

FCBYX:

-0.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIBDX achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than FCBYX's 0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, TIBDX has underperformed FCBYX with an annualized return of 1.44%, while FCBYX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.32% annualized return.


TIBDX

YTD

0.55%

1M

1.11%

6M

0.16%

1Y

4.26%

5Y*

-0.46%

10Y*

1.44%

FCBYX

YTD

0.51%

1M

0.82%

6M

2.19%

1Y

7.39%

5Y*

2.52%

10Y*

3.32%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TIBDX vs. FCBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIBDX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FCBYX's 0.59% expense ratio.


FCBYX
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
Expense ratio chart for FCBYX: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%
Expense ratio chart for TIBDX: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TIBDX vs. FCBYX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIBDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TIBDX is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TIBDX is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TIBDX is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TIBDX is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TIBDX is 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TIBDX is 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FCBYX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCBYX is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCBYX is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCBYX is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCBYX is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCBYX is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCBYX is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TIBDX vs. FCBYX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) and Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TIBDX, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.771.96
The chart of Sortino ratio for TIBDX, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.133.02
The chart of Omega ratio for TIBDX, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.141.38
The chart of Calmar ratio for TIBDX, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.311.96
The chart of Martin ratio for TIBDX, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.002.138.02
TIBDX
FCBYX

The current TIBDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the FCBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIBDX and FCBYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.77
1.96
TIBDX
FCBYX

Dividends

TIBDX vs. FCBYX - Dividend Comparison

TIBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, less than FCBYX's 5.89% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TIBDX
TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund
3.96%4.33%3.88%2.99%2.00%2.43%2.89%3.15%2.86%2.86%2.66%2.32%
FCBYX
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
5.89%6.44%5.59%4.47%3.09%3.58%3.70%3.92%4.94%5.34%5.54%5.19%

Drawdowns

TIBDX vs. FCBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIBDX drawdown since its inception was -19.54%, smaller than the maximum FCBYX drawdown of -25.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIBDX and FCBYX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.23%
-0.63%
TIBDX
FCBYX

Volatility

TIBDX vs. FCBYX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Nuveen Strategic Income Fund (FCBYX) at 0.95%. This indicates that TIBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.35%
0.95%
TIBDX
FCBYX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab