PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIWGX vs. MDVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIWGX vs. MDVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWGX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than MDVAX's 2.47% return.


FIWGX

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.12%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.06%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*

MDVAX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.73%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.70%
1Y
7.78%
3Y*
5.92%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
2.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIWGX vs. MDVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIWGX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund
-0.05%6.90%2.14%6.51%-13.71%-0.37%10.21%9.39%1.28%
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
2.47%8.40%2.47%5.81%-17.01%1.95%8.08%10.12%0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWGX and MDVAX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2018

0.88

The correlation between FIWGX and MDVAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIWGX vs. MDVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWGX
FIWGX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FIWGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

MDVAX
MDVAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MDVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
MDVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIWGX vs. MDVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIWGXMDVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.51

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.76

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.60

15.86

-9.26

FIWGX vs. MDVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the MDVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWGX and MDVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIWGXMDVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.54

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.05

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.71

-0.21

Drawdowns

FIWGX vs. MDVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWGX drawdown since its inception was -18.42%, smaller than the maximum MDVAX drawdown of -23.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWGX and MDVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWGXMDVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.42%

-23.02%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.52%

-2.21%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.24%

-5.44%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.42%

-23.02%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-3.49%

+2.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-3.47%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

0.52%

+0.60%

Volatility

FIWGX vs. MDVAX - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX) at 0.95%. This indicates that FIWGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWGXMDVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

0.95%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

2.17%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.14%

3.28%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.10%

6.46%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.51%

5.27%

+0.24%

FIWGX vs. MDVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWGX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than MDVAX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIWGX vs. MDVAX - Dividend Comparison

FIWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than MDVAX's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIWGX
Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund
3.44%3.68%4.36%3.79%2.24%1.77%6.83%4.30%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
3.99%3.91%2.45%4.87%3.76%4.06%7.20%2.90%2.86%2.64%2.11%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIWGX and MDVAX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIWGX has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to MDVAX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWGX dropped -18.42% vs MDVAX's -23.02%.

MDVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIWGX and MDVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer