FIWGX vs. FXNAX
FIWGX (Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund) and FXNAX (Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FIWGX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FXNAX is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. FIWGX is actively managed, while FXNAX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIWGX returned -0.25%/yr vs -0.55%/yr for FXNAX. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FIWGX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FXNAX.
Performance
FIWGX vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIWGX achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly lower than FXNAX's -0.92% return.
FIWGX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- 6M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 1.96%
- 3Y*
- 4.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.46%
FXNAX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- 1.47%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- -0.55%
- 10Y*
- 1.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FIWGX vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIWGX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund | -1.03% | 6.90% | 2.14% | 6.51% | -13.71% | -0.37% | 10.21% | 9.39% | 1.28% |
FXNAX Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund | -0.92% | 7.14% | 1.35% | 5.82% | -13.55% | -2.10% | 7.63% | 8.50% | 2.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIWGX and FXNAX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.94 |
The correlation between FIWGX and FXNAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIWGX vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank
FIWGX
FXNAX
FIWGX vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIWGX | FXNAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.11 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 0.80 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | 2.00 | +0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIWGX vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIWGX drawdown since its inception was -18.42%, smaller than the maximum FXNAX drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWGX and FXNAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIWGX | FXNAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.42% | -19.51% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.52% | -2.94% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.20% | -5.11% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.42% | -18.39% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -4.17% | +1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.94% | -3.86% | -1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.18% | -0.23% |
Volatility
FIWGX vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund (FIWGX) is 0.93%, while Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) has a volatility of 1.01%. This indicates that FIWGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIWGX | FXNAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 1.01% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.79% | 3.03% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.92% | 3.85% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 6.07% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.47% | 5.01% | +0.46% |
FIWGX vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIWGX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIWGX vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison
FIWGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than FXNAX's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIWGX Strategic Advisers Fidelity Core Income Fund | 3.11% | 3.68% | 4.36% | 3.79% | 2.24% | 1.77% | 6.83% | 4.30% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXNAX Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund | 3.47% | 3.58% | 3.40% | 3.15% | 1.81% | 1.74% | 2.92% | 2.68% | 2.74% | 2.57% | 2.76% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIWGX and FXNAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXNAX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to FIWGX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWGX dropped -18.42% vs FXNAX's -19.51%.
FXNAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIWGX and FXNAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer