PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIWDX vs. WACPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIWDX vs. WACPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX) and Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIWDX achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly higher than WACPX's 0.36% return.


FIWDX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.18%
YTD
3.40%
6M
3.74%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*

WACPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.63%
YTD
0.36%
6M
0.34%
1Y
5.76%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
-1.07%
10Y*
1.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIWDX vs. WACPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIWDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z
3.40%8.98%6.07%9.20%-11.76%3.51%7.60%11.20%-1.63%
WACPX
Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I
0.36%7.99%-0.77%7.51%-18.79%-2.24%9.42%12.29%1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWDX and WACPX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.77

The correlation between FIWDX and WACPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIWDX vs. WACPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWDX
FIWDX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FIWDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

WACPX
WACPX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
WACPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WACPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
WACPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
WACPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
WACPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIWDX vs. WACPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX) and Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIWDXWACPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.24

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

1.61

+2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.17

4.99

+12.18

FIWDX vs. WACPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is higher than the WACPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWDX and WACPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIWDXWACPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

1.34

+1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

-0.15

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.91

+0.03

Drawdowns

FIWDX vs. WACPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWDX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum WACPX drawdown of -25.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWDX and WACPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWDXWACPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-25.86%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-3.60%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.97%

-9.55%

+5.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.96%

-25.46%

+9.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.22%

+8.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-3.61%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

1.16%

-0.56%

Volatility

FIWDX vs. WACPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX) is 1.39%, while Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that FIWDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WACPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWDXWACPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

1.50%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

3.13%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

4.32%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.54%

7.41%

-2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.88%

6.17%

-1.29%

FIWDX vs. WACPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than WACPX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIWDX vs. WACPX - Dividend Comparison

FIWDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than WACPX's 4.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIWDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z
4.34%4.39%4.21%4.02%2.99%4.28%4.62%4.39%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WACPX
Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I
4.78%4.70%4.80%4.88%3.46%2.99%4.12%4.98%4.01%3.30%4.77%3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIWDX and WACPX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WACPX has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to FIWDX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWDX dropped -15.96% vs WACPX's -25.86%.

FIWDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIWDX and WACPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer