FIWDX vs. FADMX
FIWDX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z) and FADMX (Fidelity Strategic Income Fund) are both Total Bond Market funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FIWDX returned 3.26%/yr vs 3.28%/yr for FADMX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FIWDX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FADMX.
Performance
FIWDX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FIWDX having a 3.23% return and FADMX slightly lower at 3.12%.
FIWDX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- 10.17%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- —
FADMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 3.71%
- 1Y
- 10.02%
- 3Y*
- 8.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- —
FIWDX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIWDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z | 3.23% | 8.98% | 6.07% | 9.20% | -11.76% | 3.51% | 7.60% | 11.20% | -1.63% |
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund | 3.12% | 9.01% | 6.02% | 9.55% | -11.84% | 3.46% | 6.72% | 11.06% | -1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIWDX and FADMX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FIWDX and FADMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIWDX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank
FIWDX
FADMX
FIWDX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIWDX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.88 | 2.85 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.45 | 4.32 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.62 | 1.60 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 3.94 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.31 | 17.30 | +0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIWDX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | 2.85 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.73 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.86 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
FIWDX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIWDX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, roughly equal to the maximum FADMX drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWDX and FADMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIWDX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -15.98% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -2.62% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.97% | -3.99% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.96% | -15.98% | +0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.20% | -3.07% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.60% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Volatility
FIWDX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) have volatilities of 1.39% and 1.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIWDX | FADMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 1.34% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.94% | 2.92% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 3.51% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 4.51% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 4.77% | +0.11% |
FIWDX vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIWDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FADMX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIWDX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison
FIWDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than FADMX's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FADMX Fidelity Strategic Income Fund | 4.29% | 4.33% | 4.16% | 4.31% | 2.91% | 4.23% | 3.82% | 4.34% | 2.74% |
FIWDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z | 4.35% | 4.39% | 4.21% | 4.02% | 2.99% | 4.28% | 4.62% | 4.39% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, FIWDX and FADMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIWDX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to FADMX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWDX dropped -15.96% vs FADMX's -15.98%.
FIWDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIWDX and FADMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer