PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIWDX vs. FADMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIWDX vs. FADMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FIWDX having a 3.23% return and FADMX slightly lower at 3.12%.


FIWDX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.76%
YTD
3.23%
6M
3.74%
1Y
10.17%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
3.26%
10Y*

FADMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.76%
YTD
3.12%
6M
3.71%
1Y
10.02%
3Y*
8.15%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIWDX vs. FADMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIWDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z
3.23%8.98%6.07%9.20%-11.76%3.51%7.60%11.20%-1.63%
FADMX
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund
3.12%9.01%6.02%9.55%-11.84%3.46%6.72%11.06%-1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FIWDX and FADMX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018

0.96

The correlation between FIWDX and FADMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIWDX vs. FADMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIWDX
FIWDX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FIWDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIWDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIWDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FIWDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIWDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FADMX
FADMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FADMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FADMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FADMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FADMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FADMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIWDX vs. FADMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIWDXFADMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.88

2.85

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.45

4.32

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.60

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

3.94

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.31

17.30

+0.02

FIWDX vs. FADMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIWDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the FADMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIWDX and FADMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIWDXFADMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

2.85

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.73

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.86

+0.07

Drawdowns

FIWDX vs. FADMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIWDX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, roughly equal to the maximum FADMX drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIWDX and FADMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIWDXFADMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-15.98%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-2.62%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.97%

-3.99%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.96%

-15.98%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.20%

-3.07%

-0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.60%

0.00%

Volatility

FIWDX vs. FADMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z (FIWDX) and Fidelity Strategic Income Fund (FADMX) have volatilities of 1.39% and 1.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIWDXFADMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

1.34%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

2.92%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

3.51%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.53%

4.51%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.88%

4.77%

+0.11%

FIWDX vs. FADMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIWDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FADMX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIWDX vs. FADMX - Dividend Comparison

FIWDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than FADMX's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FADMX
Fidelity Strategic Income Fund
4.29%4.33%4.16%4.31%2.91%4.23%3.82%4.34%2.74%
FIWDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class Z
4.35%4.39%4.21%4.02%2.99%4.28%4.62%4.39%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FIWDX and FADMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIWDX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to FADMX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIWDX dropped -15.96% vs FADMX's -15.98%.

FIWDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIWDX and FADMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer