FIW vs. TDIV
FIW (First Trust Water ETF) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FIW is a Water Equities fund tracking the ISE Clean Edge Water Index, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FIW returned 12.18%/yr vs 19.34%/yr for TDIV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIW charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.
Performance
FIW vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIW achieves a -3.78% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 30.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FIW has underperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 12.18%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.34% annualized return.
FIW
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- -3.78%
- 6M
- -6.34%
- 1Y
- -2.02%
- 3Y*
- 7.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.18%
TDIV
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 15.82%
- YTD
- 30.57%
- 6M
- 28.79%
- 1Y
- 53.63%
- 3Y*
- 33.27%
- 5Y*
- 19.29%
- 10Y*
- 19.34%
FIW vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIW First Trust Water ETF | -3.78% | 7.20% | 8.38% | 20.35% | -15.70% | 32.00% | 21.15% | 37.37% | -9.23% | 24.69% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 30.57% | 25.27% | 24.43% | 36.71% | -22.13% | 29.49% | 17.55% | 33.27% | -3.18% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIW and TDIV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2012 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FIW and TDIV has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FIW vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FIW
TDIV
Industrials
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
FIW
TDIV
Utilities
FIW
TDIV
-
Healthcare
FIW
TDIV
-
Technology
FIW
TDIV
Basic Materials
FIW
TDIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
FIW
TDIV
-
Consumer Defensive
FIW
TDIV
-
Communication Services
FIW
-
TDIV
Energy
FIW
-
TDIV
-
Financial Services
FIW
-
TDIV
-
Real Estate
FIW
-
TDIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIW vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank
FIW
TDIV
FIW vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Water ETF (FIW) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIW | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.49 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 5.02 | -5.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 15.64 | -16.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIW | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | 2.93 | -3.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.94 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.93 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.88 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
FIW vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIW drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIW and TDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIW | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.75% | -31.97% | -20.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.81% | -10.74% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.32% | -23.00% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.53% | -31.97% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.60% | -31.97% | -4.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.76% | -1.79% | -7.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -4.84% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.33% | 3.44% | +1.89% |
Volatility
FIW vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Water ETF (FIW) is 4.45%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that FIW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIW | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 6.86% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 13.91% | -2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.50% | 18.47% | -2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 20.67% | -2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.90% | 20.85% | -0.95% |
FIW vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIW has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIW vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison
FIW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than TDIV's 1.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIW First Trust Water ETF | 0.79% | 0.69% | 0.69% | 0.68% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% | 0.55% | 0.73% | 1.13% | 0.51% | 0.76% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.12% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIW and TDIV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDIV has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to FIW (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIW dropped -52.75% vs TDIV's -31.97%.
On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 19.34% vs 12.18% for FIW. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FIW has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 19.34% return vs 12.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for FIW.
TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.79% for FIW.
FIW is categorized as Water Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. FIW tracks ISE Clean Edge Water Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for FIW and 0.50% for TDIV.
TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIW and TDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer