FIVY vs. QDTE
FIVY (YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. FIVY is passively managed, while QDTE is actively managed. Over the past year, FIVY returned -8.80% vs 31.05% for QDTE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIVY charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.
Performance
FIVY vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIVY achieves a -6.12% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 12.21% return.
FIVY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- -6.12%
- 6M
- -8.33%
- 1Y
- -8.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDTE
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- 12.21%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 31.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIVY vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FIVY YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF | -6.12% | -1.07% | -10.55% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 12.21% | 19.32% | -4.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIVY and QDTE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between FIVY and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
FIVY vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FIVY
QDTE
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FIVY
QDTE
-
Communication Services
FIVY
QDTE
-
Healthcare
FIVY
QDTE
-
Financial Services
FIVY
QDTE
Basic Materials
FIVY
-
QDTE
-
Consumer Cyclical
FIVY
-
QDTE
-
Consumer Defensive
FIVY
-
QDTE
-
Energy
FIVY
-
QDTE
-
Industrials
FIVY
-
QDTE
-
Real Estate
FIVY
-
QDTE
-
Utilities
FIVY
-
QDTE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIVY vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank
FIVY
QDTE
FIVY vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF (FIVY) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIVY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.34 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 3.06 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.53 | 11.78 | -12.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIVY vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVY drawdown since its inception was -32.77%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVY and QDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIVY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.77% | -22.86% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.77% | -10.20% | -22.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.89% | -3.90% | -15.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.67% | -3.13% | -10.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.60% | 2.64% | +13.96% |
Volatility
FIVY vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF (FIVY) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) have volatilities of 8.65% and 8.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIVY | QDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.65% | 8.57% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.98% | 13.27% | +8.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.19% | 16.66% | +14.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 18.97% | +13.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 18.97% | +13.85% |
FIVY vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIVY has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIVY vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison
FIVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.61%, more than QDTE's 44.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FIVY YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF | 47.61% | 46.51% | 0.00% |
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 44.39% | 49.49% | 32.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIVY and QDTE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIVY has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to QDTE (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVY dropped -32.77% vs QDTE's -22.86%.
On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 31.05% vs -8.80% for FIVY. On fees, FIVY is cheaper at 0.88% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 31.05% return vs -8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FIVY is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.
FIVY has the higher dividend yield at 47.61%, compared with 44.39% for QDTE.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for FIVY and 0.97% for QDTE.
QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIVY and QDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer