PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVY vs. QDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIVY vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF (FIVY) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVY achieves a -6.12% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 12.21% return.


FIVY

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-6.12%
6M
-8.33%
1Y
-8.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDTE

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
12.21%
6M
10.80%
1Y
31.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIVY vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FIVY and QDTE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2024

0.73

The correlation between FIVY and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIVY vs. QDTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIVY
QDTE

Technology

44.7%

-

Communication Services

22.7%

-

Healthcare

16.5%

-

Financial Services

16.1%
5.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FIVY
44.7%
QDTE

-

Communication Services

FIVY
22.7%
QDTE

-

Healthcare

FIVY
16.5%
QDTE

-

Financial Services

FIVY
16.1%
QDTE
5.4%

Basic Materials

FIVY

-

QDTE

-

Consumer Cyclical

FIVY

-

QDTE

-

Consumer Defensive

FIVY

-

QDTE

-

Energy

FIVY

-

QDTE

-

Industrials

FIVY

-

QDTE

-

Real Estate

FIVY

-

QDTE

-

Utilities

FIVY

-

QDTE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVY vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIVY
FIVY Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FIVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVY Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIVY vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF (FIVY) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIVYQDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.34

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

3.06

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

11.78

-12.31

FIVY vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVY Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVY and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIVY vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVY drawdown since its inception was -32.77%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVY and QDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVYQDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.77%

-22.86%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.77%

-10.20%

-22.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.89%

-3.90%

-15.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.67%

-3.13%

-10.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.60%

2.64%

+13.96%

Volatility

FIVY vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF (FIVY) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) have volatilities of 8.65% and 8.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVYQDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.65%

8.57%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.98%

13.27%

+8.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.19%

16.66%

+14.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.82%

18.97%

+13.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.82%

18.97%

+13.85%

FIVY vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIVY has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIVY vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

FIVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.61%, more than QDTE's 44.39% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


FIVY and QDTE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIVY has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to QDTE (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVY dropped -32.77% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 31.05% vs -8.80% for FIVY. On fees, FIVY is cheaper at 0.88% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 31.05% return vs -8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIVY is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

FIVY has the higher dividend yield at 47.61%, compared with 44.39% for QDTE.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for FIVY and 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVY and QDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer