FIVE vs. HL
FIVE (Five Below, Inc.) and HL (Hecla Mining Company) are both stocks. FIVE operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while HL operates in Other Precious Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, FIVE returned 16.19%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for HL. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FIVE vs. HL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIVE achieves a 15.27% return, which is significantly higher than HL's -26.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FIVE has outperformed HL with an annualized return of 16.19%, while HL has yielded a comparatively lower 8.43% annualized return.
FIVE
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 18.88%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- 15.27%
- 1Y
- 59.05%
- 3Y*
- 1.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 16.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.31%
HL
- 1D
- -5.43%
- 1M
- -9.43%
- 6M
- -37.28%
- YTD
- -26.39%
- 1Y
- 146.28%
- 3Y*
- 37.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.43%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FIVE Five Below, Inc. | $216.87M | $218.85M | $257.87M |
| $675.62M | $596.53M | $453.27M |
FIVE vs. HL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVE Five Below, Inc. | 15.27% | 79.46% | -50.76% | 20.52% | -14.51% | 18.24% | 36.85% | 24.96% | 54.28% | 65.97% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | -26.39% | 291.70% | 2.82% | -12.93% | 6.99% | -18.97% | 91.83% | 44.43% | -40.37% | -24.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIVE and HL is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2012 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
FIVE:
$12.01B
HL:
$9.47B
FIVE:
$7.93
HL:
$0.83
FIVE:
27.37
HL:
17.01
FIVE:
3.04
HL:
0.07
FIVE:
2.37
HL:
6.05
FIVE:
5.22
HL:
3.71
FIVE:
$5.08B
HL:
$1.57B
FIVE:
$1.77B
HL:
$788.95M
FIVE:
$757.48M
HL:
$864.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIVE vs. HL — Risk / Return Rank
FIVE
HL
FIVE vs. HL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIVE | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.64 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | 4.75 | +1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIVE vs. HL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVE drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, smaller than the maximum HL drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVE and HL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIVE | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.40% | -97.92% | +21.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.85% | -55.81% | +26.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.13% | -55.81% | -18.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.40% | -55.81% | -20.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.40% | -82.45% | +6.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.35% | -55.59% | +43.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.18% | -69.88% | +46.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.00% | 30.92% | -20.92% |
Volatility
FIVE vs. HL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) is 7.87%, while Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a volatility of 17.22%. This indicates that FIVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIVE | HL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.87% | 17.22% | -9.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.41% | 51.30% | -20.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.58% | 73.85% | -34.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.04% | 59.58% | -11.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.20% | 62.79% | -16.59% |
Dividends
FIVE vs. HL - Dividend Comparison
FIVE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVE Five Below, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HL Hecla Mining Company | 0.11% | 0.08% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.25% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.25% | 0.19% | 0.53% |
Financials
FIVE vs. HL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Five Below, Inc. and Hecla Mining Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FIVE vs. HL - Profitability Comparison
FIVE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Five Below, Inc. reported a gross profit of 427.52M and revenue of 1.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.
HL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.
FIVE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Five Below, Inc. reported an operating income of 154.24M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.0%.
HL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.
FIVE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Five Below, Inc. reported a net income of 123.06M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.
HL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FIVE and HL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HL has higher volatility (17.22%) compared to FIVE (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVE dropped -76.40% vs HL's -97.92%.
HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIVE and HL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer