PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVE vs. ANAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FIVE vs. ANAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVE achieves a 15.27% return, which is significantly lower than ANAB's 65.10% return.


FIVE

1D
-0.93%
1M
18.88%
6M
13.30%
YTD
15.27%
1Y
59.05%
3Y*
1.59%
5Y*
2.23%
10Y*
16.19%
ALL TIME*
16.31%

ANAB

1D
-3.05%
1M
-18.45%
6M
68.83%
YTD
65.10%
1Y
226.03%
3Y*
57.31%
5Y*
28.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$39.97M$46.98M$40.05M
$216.87M$218.85M$257.87M

FIVE vs. ANAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
15.27%79.46%-50.76%20.52%-14.51%18.24%36.85%24.96%54.28%69.49%
ANAB
AnaptysBio, Inc.
65.10%266.16%-38.19%-30.88%-10.82%61.63%32.31%-74.53%-36.67%529.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVE and ANAB is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2017

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FIVE:

$12.01B

ANAB:

$2.30B

EPS

FIVE:

$7.93

ANAB:

-$0.90

PS Ratio

FIVE:

2.37

ANAB:

6.82

PB Ratio

FIVE:

5.22

ANAB:

120.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

FIVE:

$5.08B

ANAB:

$232.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FIVE:

$1.77B

ANAB:

$245.59M

EBITDA (TTM)

FIVE:

$757.48M

ANAB:

$52.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVE vs. ANAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIVE
FIVE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FIVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ANAB
ANAB Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ANAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANAB Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ANAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANAB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIVE vs. ANAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIVEANABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.45

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

8.14

-6.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

19.84

-13.91

FIVE vs. ANAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the ANAB Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVE and ANAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIVE vs. ANAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVE drawdown since its inception was -76.40%, smaller than the maximum ANAB drawdown of -92.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVE and ANAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVEANABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.40%

-92.08%

+15.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.85%

-27.96%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.13%

-69.32%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.40%

-69.32%

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.35%

-37.74%

+25.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.18%

-64.17%

+40.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.00%

11.45%

-1.45%

Volatility

FIVE vs. ANAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) is 7.87%, while AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) has a volatility of 27.46%. This indicates that FIVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVEANABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.87%

27.46%

-19.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.41%

51.26%

-20.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.58%

73.55%

-33.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.04%

66.36%

-18.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.20%

75.51%

-29.31%

Dividends

FIVE vs. ANAB - Dividend Comparison

Neither FIVE nor ANAB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FIVE vs. ANAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Five Below, Inc. and AnaptysBio, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FIVE and ANAB have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANAB has higher volatility (27.46%) compared to FIVE (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVE dropped -76.40% vs ANAB's -92.08%.

ANAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVE and ANAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer