PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIVA vs. FELC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIVA vs. FELC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 18.57% return, which is significantly higher than FELC's 15.39% return.


FIVA

1D
0.87%
1M
3.50%
6M
9.84%
YTD
18.57%
1Y
39.55%
3Y*
23.13%
5Y*
14.16%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.21%

FELC

1D
1.60%
1M
4.76%
6M
14.49%
YTD
15.39%
1Y
26.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$36.51M$31.04M$36.50M
$3.16M$3.09M$3.15M

FIVA vs. FELC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
18.57%45.83%2.53%5.22%
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
15.39%17.09%25.25%6.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FIVA and FELC is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2023

0.63

The correlation between FIVA and FELC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

FIVA vs. FELC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FIVA
FELC

Financial Services

26.1%
12.6%

Industrials

17.9%
10.1%

Technology

15.8%
40.7%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.5%

Basic Materials

7.1%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
2.4%

Energy

4.8%
2.7%

Utilities

3.4%
1.5%

Communication Services

2.8%
10.8%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.0%

Financial Services

FIVA
26.1%
FELC
12.6%

Industrials

FIVA
17.9%
FELC
10.1%

Technology

FIVA
15.8%
FELC
40.7%

Healthcare

FIVA
8.3%
FELC
8.5%

Basic Materials

FIVA
7.1%
FELC
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FIVA
6.9%
FELC
9.1%

Consumer Defensive

FIVA
5.4%
FELC
2.4%

Energy

FIVA
4.8%
FELC
2.7%

Utilities

FIVA
3.4%
FELC
1.5%

Communication Services

FIVA
2.8%
FELC
10.8%

Real Estate

FIVA
1.6%
FELC
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIVA vs. FELC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIVA
FIVA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FIVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIVA Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FIVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIVA Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FELC
FELC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELC Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIVA vs. FELC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIVAFELCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.37

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

2.93

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.44

12.73

+0.72

FIVA vs. FELC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the FELC Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIVA and FELC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIVA vs. FELC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, which is greater than FELC's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and FELC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIVAFELCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-18.59%

-21.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-9.09%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-1.88%

-5.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.09%

+0.86%

Volatility

FIVA vs. FELC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) at 3.99%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FELC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIVAFELCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

3.99%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.77%

10.32%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.00%

12.98%

+3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

15.19%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

15.19%

+2.72%

FIVA vs. FELC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FIVA and FELC have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIVA vs. FELC - Dividend Comparison

FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than FELC's 0.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
0.81%0.92%1.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIVA
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
2.54%2.68%3.52%3.63%3.62%3.76%2.46%3.61%3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIVA and FELC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIVA has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to FELC (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs FELC's -18.59%.

On 1-year performance, FIVA leads with 39.55% vs 26.51% for FELC. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, FELC has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FIVA has performed better with a 39.55% return vs 26.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIVA and FELC have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

FIVA has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.81% for FELC.

FIVA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FELC is Large Cap Blend Equities.

FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIVA and FELC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer