FIVA vs. FDVV
FIVA (Fidelity International Value Factor ETF) and FDVV (Fidelity High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FIVA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Fidelity® International Value Factor Index, while FDVV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIVA returned 12.50%/yr vs 13.36%/yr for FDVV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIVA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FDVV.
Performance
FIVA vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIVA achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly higher than FDVV's 8.39% return.
FIVA
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- 1Y
- 35.97%
- 3Y*
- 22.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
FDVV
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 8.39%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- —
FIVA vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 12.92% | 45.83% | 2.53% | 20.38% | -10.37% | 15.90% | -1.78% | 19.78% | -19.20% |
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 8.39% | 17.08% | 21.81% | 18.00% | -4.21% | 29.24% | 2.80% | 24.07% | -4.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIVA and FDVV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FIVA and FDVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
FIVA vs. FDVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FIVA
FDVV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
FIVA
FDVV
Industrials
FIVA
FDVV
Technology
FIVA
FDVV
Healthcare
FIVA
FDVV
Basic Materials
FIVA
FDVV
-
Consumer Cyclical
FIVA
FDVV
Energy
FIVA
FDVV
-
Consumer Defensive
FIVA
FDVV
Utilities
FIVA
FDVV
Communication Services
FIVA
FDVV
Real Estate
FIVA
FDVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIVA vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank
FIVA
FDVV
FIVA vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIVA | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.43 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 2.53 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 10.54 | +1.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIVA | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.35 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.91 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.79 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
FIVA vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIVA drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, roughly equal to the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIVA and FDVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIVA | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -40.25% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -9.30% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | -15.90% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.70% | -20.18% | -8.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -1.12% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -3.81% | -3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.23% | +0.76% |
Volatility
FIVA vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF (FIVA) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 3.14%. This indicates that FIVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIVA | FDVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 3.14% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 7.99% | +4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 10.06% | +5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 14.75% | +1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 17.00% | +0.90% |
FIVA vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIVA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FDVV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIVA vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison
FIVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than FDVV's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | 2.72% | 2.89% | 2.94% | 3.77% | 3.44% | 2.70% | 3.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 3.66% | 1.04% |
FIVA Fidelity International Value Factor ETF | 2.52% | 2.68% | 3.52% | 3.63% | 3.62% | 3.76% | 2.46% | 3.61% | 3.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIVA and FDVV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIVA has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to FDVV (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIVA dropped -39.76% vs FDVV's -40.25%.
On 5-year performance, FDVV leads with 13.36% vs 12.50% for FIVA. On fees, FDVV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FDVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDVV has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDVV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FIVA.
FDVV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.52% for FIVA.
FIVA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FDVV is Large Cap Blend Equities. FIVA tracks Fidelity® International Value Factor Index, while FDVV tracks Fidelity Core Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FIVA and 0.29% for FDVV.
FIVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIVA and FDVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer