PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITLX vs. FNDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FITLX vs. FNDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) and Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITLX achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly higher than FNDSX's 0.10% return.


FITLX

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
8.80%
6M
7.56%
1Y
26.05%
3Y*
21.42%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*

FNDSX

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.42%
1Y
4.12%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITLX vs. FNDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FITLX
Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
8.80%18.77%23.59%29.04%-20.28%31.55%18.69%31.54%-7.44%
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
0.10%7.03%1.23%5.44%-13.34%-2.22%6.95%8.30%1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FITLX and FNDSX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.04

Over the past year, FITLX and FNDSX have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FITLX vs. FNDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITLX
FITLX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FITLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FITLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDSX
FNDSX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FNDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITLX vs. FNDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) and Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FITLXFNDSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.20

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.48

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

4.17

+6.42

FITLX vs. FNDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the FNDSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITLX and FNDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FITLX vs. FNDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITLX drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, which is greater than FNDSX's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITLX and FNDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FITLXFNDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

-19.72%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-2.94%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.99%

-6.11%

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.91%

-18.30%

-8.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-4.06%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-6.48%

+1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

1.04%

+1.56%

Volatility

FITLX vs. FNDSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund (FNDSX) at 1.20%. This indicates that FITLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FITLXFNDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

1.20%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

2.89%

+7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.38%

3.92%

+9.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

6.01%

+11.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

5.30%

+13.81%

FITLX vs. FNDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITLX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDSX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FITLX vs. FNDSX - Dividend Comparison

FITLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than FNDSX's 3.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FITLX
Fidelity U.S. Sustainability Index Fund
1.02%1.11%1.29%1.12%1.49%0.99%1.01%1.41%1.58%0.76%
FNDSX
Fidelity Sustainability Bond Index Fund
3.97%3.84%3.53%2.84%1.55%1.17%1.79%3.17%1.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FITLX and FNDSX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FITLX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to FNDSX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITLX dropped -34.35% vs FNDSX's -19.72%.

FITLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FITLX and FNDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer