PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITLX vs. FNIDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FITLX vs. FNIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) and Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITLX achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than FNIDX's 10.29% return.


FITLX

1D
0.87%
1M
5.46%
YTD
10.96%
6M
12.04%
1Y
30.23%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*

FNIDX

1D
0.54%
1M
2.81%
YTD
10.29%
6M
12.60%
1Y
25.96%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITLX vs. FNIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FITLX
Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund
10.96%18.77%23.59%29.04%-20.28%31.55%18.69%31.54%-3.32%13.07%
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
10.29%29.80%5.67%14.65%-18.89%7.65%12.98%22.20%-14.00%12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FITLX and FNIDX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2017

0.76

The correlation between FITLX and FNIDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FITLX vs. FNIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITLX
FITLX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FITLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FITLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FNIDX
FNIDX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FNIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FNIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITLX vs. FNIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) and Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FITLXFNIDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

1.84

+0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

2.56

+0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.34

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.38

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.75

9.08

+2.68

FITLX vs. FNIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the FNIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITLX and FNIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FITLXFNIDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.84

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.42

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.49

+0.33

Drawdowns

FITLX vs. FNIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITLX drawdown since its inception was -34.35%, roughly equal to the maximum FNIDX drawdown of -33.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITLX and FNIDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FITLXFNIDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.35%

-33.17%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.15%

-11.36%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.99%

-14.92%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.91%

-32.79%

+5.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.08%

-8.26%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.97%

-0.41%

Volatility

FITLX vs. FNIDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund (FITLX) is 3.49%, while Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd (FNIDX) has a volatility of 4.41%. This indicates that FITLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FITLXFNIDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

4.41%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

12.30%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

14.89%

-2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

15.80%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

16.55%

+2.56%

FITLX vs. FNIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITLX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FNIDX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FITLX vs. FNIDX - Dividend Comparison

FITLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than FNIDX's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FITLX
Fidelity US Sustainability Index Fund
1.00%1.11%1.29%1.12%1.49%0.99%1.01%1.41%1.58%0.76%
FNIDX
Fidelity International Sustainability Index Fd
2.55%2.81%2.34%2.64%2.32%1.93%1.13%2.17%2.28%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FITLX and FNIDX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNIDX has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to FITLX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITLX dropped -34.35% vs FNIDX's -33.17%.

FITLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FITLX and FNIDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer