FITGX vs. PZRIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) and PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX).
FITGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2007. PZRIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 4, 2015.
Performance
FITGX vs. PZRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FITGX vs. PZRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITGX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M | -2.29% | 17.28% | 4.72% | 20.18% | -23.61% | 14.76% | 16.31% | 33.19% | -12.05% | 28.83% |
PZRIX PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund | 9.93% | 34.05% | 3.29% | 19.31% | -9.11% | 12.08% | 1.74% | 15.94% | -14.93% | 26.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FITGX achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than PZRIX's 9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FITGX has underperformed PZRIX with an annualized return of 8.19%, while PZRIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.15% annualized return.
FITGX
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 11.97%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
PZRIX
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 17.91%
- 1Y
- 37.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FITGX vs. PZRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITGX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PZRIX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FITGX vs. PZRIX — Risk / Return Rank
FITGX
PZRIX
FITGX vs. PZRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) and PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FITGX | PZRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 2.67 | -2.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 3.39 | -2.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.52 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 3.09 | -2.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | 14.29 | -10.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FITGX | PZRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 2.67 | -2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.69 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.59 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between FITGX and PZRIX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FITGX vs. PZRIX - Dividend Comparison
FITGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than PZRIX's 5.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITGX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M | 3.05% | 2.98% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.27% | 0.12% | 0.66% | 0.16% |
PZRIX PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund | 5.96% | 6.56% | 6.70% | 9.19% | 8.80% | 11.99% | 2.04% | 6.32% | 2.80% | 4.13% | 2.58% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FITGX vs. PZRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITGX drawdown since its inception was -56.26%, which is greater than PZRIX's maximum drawdown of -43.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITGX and PZRIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITGX | PZRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.26% | -43.53% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.99% | -10.68% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.26% | -30.85% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.26% | -43.53% | +8.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.66% | -5.20% | -5.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -9.00% | -1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.45% | +1.15% |
Volatility
FITGX vs. PZRIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX) at 5.45%. This indicates that FITGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FITGX | PZRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 5.45% | +3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 8.92% | +4.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.32% | 14.17% | +5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 15.85% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 17.02% | +0.53% |