FITGX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FITGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2007. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FITGX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FITGX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITGX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M | -5.92% | 17.28% | 4.72% | 20.18% | -23.61% | 14.76% | 16.31% | 33.19% | -12.05% | 28.83% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FITGX achieves a -5.92% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FITGX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 7.78%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
FITGX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -13.45%
- YTD
- -5.92%
- 6M
- -5.83%
- 1Y
- 8.40%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FITGX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITGX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FITGX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
FITGX
FSKAX
FITGX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FITGX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 0.83 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 1.29 | -0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.19 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 1.04 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 5.05 | -3.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FITGX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 0.83 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.59 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.72 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.78 | -0.54 |
Correlation
The correlation between FITGX and FSKAX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FITGX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FITGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITGX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M | 3.17% | 2.98% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.27% | 0.12% | 0.66% | 0.16% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
FITGX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITGX drawdown since its inception was -56.26%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITGX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITGX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.26% | -35.01% | -21.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.99% | -12.42% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.26% | -25.39% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.26% | -35.01% | -0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.99% | -8.92% | -5.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -4.05% | -6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 2.57% | +0.97% |
Volatility
FITGX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 4.42%. This indicates that FITGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FITGX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 4.42% | +3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.63% | 9.40% | +3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.97% | 18.50% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 17.38% | +0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 18.42% | -0.91% |