PZRIX vs. AWPAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX) and AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX).
PZRIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 4, 2015. AWPAX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jun 1, 1994.
Performance
PZRIX vs. AWPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PZRIX vs. AWPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZRIX PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund | 9.93% | 34.05% | 3.29% | 19.31% | -9.11% | 12.08% | 1.74% | 15.94% | -14.93% | 26.00% |
AWPAX AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund | -4.95% | 13.57% | -0.32% | 13.09% | -26.80% | 9.20% | 29.55% | 26.88% | -17.50% | 34.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZRIX achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than AWPAX's -4.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PZRIX has outperformed AWPAX with an annualized return of 10.15%, while AWPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.44% annualized return.
PZRIX
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 17.91%
- 1Y
- 37.11%
- 3Y*
- 19.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
AWPAX
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -8.33%
- YTD
- -4.95%
- 6M
- -4.86%
- 1Y
- 7.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PZRIX vs. AWPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PZRIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than AWPAX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PZRIX vs. AWPAX — Risk / Return Rank
PZRIX
AWPAX
PZRIX vs. AWPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX) and AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PZRIX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.67 | 0.46 | +2.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.39 | 0.76 | +2.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.10 | +0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 0.53 | +2.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.29 | 2.07 | +12.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PZRIX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 0.46 | +2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | -0.03 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.33 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.32 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between PZRIX and AWPAX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PZRIX vs. AWPAX - Dividend Comparison
PZRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, while AWPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZRIX PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund | 5.96% | 6.56% | 6.70% | 9.19% | 8.80% | 11.99% | 2.04% | 6.32% | 2.80% | 4.13% | 2.58% |
AWPAX AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 7.00% | 1.67% | 1.11% | 14.44% | 0.00% | 0.77% |
Drawdowns
PZRIX vs. AWPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZRIX drawdown since its inception was -43.53%, smaller than the maximum AWPAX drawdown of -63.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZRIX and AWPAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZRIX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.53% | -63.00% | +19.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -13.44% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.85% | -38.13% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.53% | -38.13% | -5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | -13.22% | +8.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.00% | -18.85% | +9.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 3.45% | -1.00% |
Volatility
PZRIX vs. AWPAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAE Global ex-US Fund (PZRIX) is 5.45%, while AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX) has a volatility of 8.77%. This indicates that PZRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PZRIX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 8.77% | -3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.92% | 12.25% | -3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.17% | 17.35% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 17.12% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 16.67% | +0.35% |