FITGX vs. VYM
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM).
FITGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 2007. VYM is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. It was launched on Feb 7, 2019.
Performance
FITGX vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FITGX vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITGX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M | -2.29% | 17.28% | 4.72% | 20.18% | -23.61% | 14.76% | 16.31% | 33.19% | -12.05% | 28.83% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 3.69% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FITGX achieves a -2.29% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 3.69% return. Over the past 10 years, FITGX has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 8.19%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.22% annualized return.
FITGX
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 11.97%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
VYM
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.02%
- YTD
- 3.69%
- 6M
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 17.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 11.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FITGX vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITGX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FITGX vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
FITGX
VYM
FITGX vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FITGX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 1.19 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 1.70 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.26 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 1.56 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | 6.86 | -3.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FITGX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 1.19 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.79 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.69 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.49 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between FITGX and VYM is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FITGX vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
FITGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than VYM's 2.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITGX Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M | 3.05% | 2.98% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 0.00% | 0.42% | 0.27% | 0.12% | 0.66% | 0.16% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.37% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Drawdowns
FITGX vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITGX drawdown since its inception was -56.26%, roughly equal to the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITGX and VYM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITGX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.26% | -56.98% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.99% | -11.32% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.26% | -15.84% | -19.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.26% | -35.21% | -0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.66% | -4.91% | -5.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.89% | -7.25% | -3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.57% | +1.03% |
Volatility
FITGX vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.60%. This indicates that FITGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FITGX | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 3.60% | +5.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 7.96% | +5.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.32% | 15.14% | +4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 13.97% | +3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 16.33% | +1.22% |