PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FITGX vs. IVFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FITGX vs. IVFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITGX achieves a 8.39% return, which is significantly lower than IVFIX's 11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, FITGX has outperformed IVFIX with an annualized return of 8.78%, while IVFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.22% annualized return.


FITGX

1D
1.13%
1M
-1.59%
6M
2.59%
YTD
8.39%
1Y
13.80%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
4.33%
10Y*
8.78%
ALL TIME*
5.49%

IVFIX

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.48%
6M
5.50%
YTD
11.32%
1Y
21.85%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
7.22%
ALL TIME*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FITGX vs. IVFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FITGX
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M
8.39%17.28%4.72%20.18%-23.61%14.76%16.31%33.19%-12.05%28.83%
IVFIX
Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund
11.32%31.79%1.91%11.05%-2.54%11.58%-1.74%20.15%-11.96%14.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FITGX and IVFIX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2008

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between FITGX and IVFIX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FITGX vs. IVFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FITGX
FITGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FITGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FITGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FITGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FITGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FITGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IVFIX
IVFIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IVFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IVFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FITGX vs. IVFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FITGXIVFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.45

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

4.13

-3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.73

9.51

-5.77

FITGX vs. IVFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the IVFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITGX and IVFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FITGX vs. IVFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITGX drawdown since its inception was -56.26%, which is greater than IVFIX's maximum drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITGX and IVFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FITGXIVFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.26%

-51.49%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.99%

-6.97%

-7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.56%

-10.75%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.26%

-21.29%

-13.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.26%

-33.46%

-1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-1.16%

-2.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.76%

-11.55%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

2.83%

+1.29%

Volatility

FITGX vs. IVFIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M (FITGX) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) at 2.66%. This indicates that FITGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FITGXIVFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

2.66%

+3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.24%

9.73%

+8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.63%

12.04%

+8.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.57%

13.14%

+5.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

14.56%

+3.35%

FITGX vs. IVFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITGX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IVFIX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

FITGX vs. IVFIX - Dividend Comparison

FITGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than IVFIX's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FITGX
Fidelity Advisor International Growth Fund Class M
2.75%2.98%0.74%0.00%1.47%1.52%0.00%0.42%0.27%0.12%0.66%0.16%
IVFIX
Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund
3.55%3.37%4.44%4.01%3.99%3.67%3.62%3.98%4.97%4.17%3.38%3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


FITGX and IVFIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FITGX has higher volatility (6.63%) compared to IVFIX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITGX dropped -56.26% vs IVFIX's -51.49%.

IVFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FITGX and IVFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer