FITE vs. STHH

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FITE (SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF) and STHH (STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged) are both Technology Equities funds - FITE tracks the S&P Kensho Future Security Index while STHH tracks the STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FITE returned 70.32% vs 217.80% for STHH. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FITE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for STHH.

Performance

FITE vs. STHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FITE achieves a 38.91% return, which is significantly lower than STHH's 208.14% return.

FITE

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 24.61%
• YTD: 38.91%
• 6M: 44.36%
• 1Y: 70.32%
• 3Y*: 35.56%
• 5Y*: 18.73%
• 10Y*: —

STHH

• 1D: 15.17%
• 1M: 43.33%
• YTD: 208.14%
• 6M: 229.02%
• 1Y: 217.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FITE vs. STHH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF	38.91%	40.15%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	208.14%	16.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FITE and STHH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

FITE vs. STHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FITE

FITE Risk / Return Rank: 79
FITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FITE Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FITE Martin Ratio Rank: 72

STHH

STHH Risk / Return Rank: 89
STHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
STHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
STHH Omega Ratio Rank: 91
STHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
STHH Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FITE vs. STHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FITE	STHH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	4.35	-1.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	4.29	-0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.61	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.68	6.36	-1.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.80	14.46	-0.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FITE vs. STHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FITE Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is lower than the STHH Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FITE and STHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FITE	STHH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88	4.35	-1.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	4.43	-3.63

Drawdowns

FITE vs. STHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FITE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, which is greater than STHH's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITE and STHH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FITE	STHH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.90%	-33.89%	-3.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.35%	-33.89%	+18.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.07%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.40%	-10.49%	+3.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.20%	14.90%	-9.70%

Volatility

FITE vs. STHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) is 7.23%, while STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged (STHH) has a volatility of 20.47%. This indicates that FITE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FITE	STHH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.23%	20.47%	-13.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.71%	36.77%	-17.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.57%	50.41%	-25.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.37%	49.52%	-27.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.03%	49.52%	-26.49%

FITE vs. STHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FITE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than STHH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FITE vs. STHH - Dividend Comparison

FITE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than STHH's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF	0.15%	0.23%	0.12%	0.13%	0.12%	0.92%	0.88%	0.44%	1.79%
STHH STMicroelectronics NV ADRhedged	0.55%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FITE and STHH in my portfolio?

FITE and STHH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FITE or STHH?

STHH has higher volatility (20.47%) compared to FITE (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITE dropped -36.90% vs STHH's -33.89%.

Which ETF is better, FITE or STHH?

On 1-year performance, STHH leads with 217.80% vs 70.32% for FITE. On fees, STHH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FITE has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FITE or STHH?

Over the 1-year period, STHH has performed better with a 217.80% return vs 70.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FITE or STHH?

STHH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FITE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FITE or STHH?

STHH has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.15% for FITE.

What is the main difference between FITE and STHH?

FITE tracks S&P Kensho Future Security Index, while STHH tracks STMicroelectronics NV Local Shares Total Return. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FITE and 0.19% for STHH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.