FITE vs. SMH
FITE (SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FITE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Future Security Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FITE returned 18.73%/yr vs 39.58%/yr for SMH. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FITE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
FITE vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FITE achieves a 38.91% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 75.55% return.
FITE
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 24.61%
- YTD
- 38.91%
- 6M
- 44.36%
- 1Y
- 70.32%
- 3Y*
- 35.56%
- 5Y*
- 18.73%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- 24.01%
- YTD
- 75.55%
- 6M
- 76.44%
- 1Y
- 160.66%
- 3Y*
- 63.68%
- 5Y*
- 39.58%
- 10Y*
- 37.55%
FITE vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF | 38.91% | 27.73% | 21.63% | 28.48% | -17.98% | 14.45% | 20.38% | 33.96% | -0.53% | -0.35% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 75.55% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between FITE and SMH is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2017 | 0.66 |
The correlation between FITE and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FITE vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FITE
SMH
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FITE
SMH
Industrials
FITE
SMH
-
Communication Services
FITE
SMH
-
Healthcare
FITE
SMH
-
Energy
FITE
SMH
-
Basic Materials
FITE
-
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
FITE
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
FITE
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
FITE
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
FITE
-
SMH
-
Utilities
FITE
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FITE vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
FITE
SMH
FITE vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FITE | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.88 | 5.29 | -2.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.64 | 5.29 | -1.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.73 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.68 | 11.02 | -6.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.80 | 42.34 | -28.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FITE | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | 5.29 | -2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 1.14 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.34 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
FITE vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FITE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FITE and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FITE | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.90% | -84.96% | +48.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.35% | -14.93% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.07% | -35.74% | +13.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.14% | -45.30% | +18.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.40% | -41.09% | +33.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 3.89% | +1.31% |
Volatility
FITE vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF (FITE) is 7.23%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.59%. This indicates that FITE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FITE | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 11.59% | -4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.71% | 24.29% | -4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.57% | 30.57% | -6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 35.02% | -12.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.03% | 32.58% | -9.55% |
FITE vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FITE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FITE vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
FITE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than SMH's 0.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FITE SPDR S&P Kensho Future Security ETF | 0.15% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.12% | 0.92% | 0.88% | 0.44% | 1.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FITE and SMH have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.59%) compared to FITE (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FITE dropped -36.90% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 5-year performance, SMH leads with 39.58% vs 18.73% for FITE. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FITE has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMH has performed better with a 39.58% return vs 18.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FITE.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.15% for FITE.
FITE is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. FITE tracks S&P Kensho Future Security Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FITE and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.29 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FITE and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer