FISV vs. SMH
FISV (Fiserv, Inc) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, FISV returned -0.91%/yr vs 36.05%/yr for SMH. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FISV vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FISV achieves a -25.03% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 64.04% return. Over the past 10 years, FISV has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of -0.91%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.05% annualized return.
FISV
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- 6M
- -25.39%
- YTD
- -25.03%
- 1Y
- -69.37%
- 3Y*
- -26.72%
- 5Y*
- -14.65%
- 10Y*
- -0.91%
SMH
- 1D
- -1.59%
- 1M
- -8.70%
- 6M
- 52.12%
- YTD
- 64.04%
- 1Y
- 103.79%
- 3Y*
- 56.28%
- 5Y*
- 37.60%
- 10Y*
- 36.05%
FISV vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISV Fiserv, Inc | -25.03% | -67.30% | 54.64% | 31.43% | -2.62% | -8.84% | -1.53% | 57.34% | 12.09% | 23.38% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 64.04% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FISV and SMH is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.48 |
The correlation between FISV and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FISV vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
FISV
SMH
FISV vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiserv, Inc (FISV) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FISV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.65 | 1.43 | -0.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 6.99 | -7.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 22.21 | -23.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FISV vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FISV drawdown since its inception was -80.16%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISV and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FISV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.16% | -84.96% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.81% | -14.93% | -56.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.16% | -35.74% | -44.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.16% | -45.30% | -34.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.16% | -45.30% | -34.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.82% | -11.68% | -67.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.33% | -40.93% | +29.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.98% | 4.69% | +50.29% |
Volatility
FISV vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fiserv, Inc (FISV) is 16.11%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 17.35%. This indicates that FISV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FISV | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.11% | 17.35% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.16% | 31.34% | -1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.57% | 36.79% | +20.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.24% | 36.19% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.96% | 33.14% | -1.18% |
Dividends
FISV vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
FISV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISV Fiserv, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FISV and SMH have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (17.35%) compared to FISV (16.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISV dropped -80.16% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FISV and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer