PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISV vs. HLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

FISV vs. HLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fiserv, Inc (FISV) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FISV vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FISV
Fiserv, Inc
-16.93%-67.30%54.64%31.43%-2.62%-8.84%-1.53%57.34%12.09%23.38%
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
5.91%16.49%36.11%44.68%-18.72%40.20%0.47%55.48%-9.40%829.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FISV:

$29.96B

HLT:

$71.15B

EPS

FISV:

$6.40

HLT:

$6.13

PE Ratio

FISV:

8.72

HLT:

49.60

PEG Ratio

FISV:

0.24

HLT:

0.80

PS Ratio

FISV:

1.43

HLT:

6.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

FISV:

$21.19B

HLT:

$12.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FISV:

$9.57B

HLT:

$3.87B

EBITDA (TTM)

FISV:

$7.86B

HLT:

$2.28B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISV achieves a -16.93% return, which is significantly lower than HLT's 5.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FISV has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 0.77%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 46.47% annualized return.


FISV

1D
2.33%
1M
-10.42%
YTD
-16.93%
6M
-56.72%
1Y
-74.73%
3Y*
-20.97%
5Y*
-14.51%
10Y*
0.77%

HLT

1D
2.77%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
5.91%
6M
17.33%
1Y
33.93%
3Y*
29.60%
5Y*
20.42%
10Y*
46.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISV vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISV
FISV Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FISV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISV Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISV Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FISV Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISV Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

HLT
HLT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISV vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiserv, Inc (FISV) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FISVHLTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.24

1.33

-2.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.00

2.00

-3.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.59

1.25

-0.66

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

2.69

-3.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.40

7.80

-9.20

FISV vs. HLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISV Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the HLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISV and HLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FISVHLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.24

1.33

-2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.76

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

0.26

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.23

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between FISV and HLT is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FISV vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison

FISV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISV
Fiserv, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
0.20%0.21%0.24%0.33%0.36%0.00%0.13%0.54%0.84%31.40%1.03%0.65%

Drawdowns

FISV vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISV drawdown since its inception was -77.33%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISV and HLT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FISVHLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.33%

-50.82%

-26.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.17%

-13.01%

-63.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.33%

-32.65%

-44.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.33%

-50.82%

-26.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.53%

-6.43%

-70.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.82%

-9.81%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

52.81%

4.49%

+48.32%

Volatility

FISV vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison

Fiserv, Inc (FISV) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) at 7.59%. This indicates that FISV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FISVHLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.00%

7.59%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.83%

16.42%

+46.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.67%

25.61%

+35.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.95%

26.96%

+7.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.21%

180.99%

-149.78%

Financials

FISV vs. HLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fiserv, Inc and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
5.28B
3.09B
(FISV) Total Revenue
(HLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FISV vs. HLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fiserv, Inc and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober0
41.5%
Portfolio components
FISV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.28B and revenue of 3.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.5%.

FISV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported an operating income of 1.29B and revenue of 5.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.4%.

HLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 602.00M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

FISV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fiserv, Inc reported a net income of 811.00M and revenue of 5.28B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

HLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 297.00M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.