FISV vs. EEM
FISV (Fiserv, Inc) is a stock, while EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) is Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Over the past 10 years, FISV returned -0.91%/yr vs 8.63%/yr for EEM. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FISV vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FISV achieves a -25.03% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 20.47% return. Over the past 10 years, FISV has underperformed EEM with an annualized return of -0.91%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.63% annualized return.
FISV
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- 6M
- -25.39%
- YTD
- -25.03%
- 1Y
- -69.37%
- 3Y*
- -26.72%
- 5Y*
- -14.65%
- 10Y*
- -0.91%
EEM
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -5.99%
- 6M
- 14.13%
- YTD
- 20.47%
- 1Y
- 37.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
FISV vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FISV Fiserv, Inc | -25.03% | -67.30% | 54.64% | 31.43% | -2.62% | -8.84% | -1.53% | 57.34% | 12.09% | 23.38% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 20.47% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FISV and EEM is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2003 | 0.47 |
The correlation between FISV and EEM shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FISV vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
FISV
EEM
FISV vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiserv, Inc (FISV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FISV | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.65 | 1.30 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 2.77 | -3.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 9.32 | -10.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FISV vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FISV drawdown since its inception was -80.16%, which is greater than EEM's maximum drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISV and EEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FISV | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.16% | -66.43% | -13.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.81% | -13.52% | -58.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.16% | -17.29% | -62.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.16% | -35.20% | -44.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.16% | -39.82% | -40.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.82% | -7.92% | -70.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.33% | -15.97% | +4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.98% | 4.02% | +50.96% |
Volatility
FISV vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
Fiserv, Inc (FISV) has a higher volatility of 16.11% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) at 10.50%. This indicates that FISV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FISV | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.11% | 10.50% | +5.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.16% | 21.59% | +8.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.57% | 23.59% | +33.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.24% | 19.73% | +16.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.96% | 20.71% | +11.25% |
Dividends
FISV vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
FISV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.70% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
FISV Fiserv, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FISV and EEM have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FISV has higher volatility (16.11%) compared to EEM (10.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISV dropped -80.16% vs EEM's -66.43%.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FISV and EEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer