PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FISMX vs. WGROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FISMX vs. WGROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) and Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FISMX achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly higher than WGROX's 1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FISMX has underperformed WGROX with an annualized return of 8.45%, while WGROX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.46% annualized return.


FISMX

1D
-2.43%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
6.71%
6M
8.63%
1Y
14.65%
3Y*
13.10%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
8.45%

WGROX

1D
-2.09%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
1.09%
6M
-0.68%
1Y
-4.66%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
0.46%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FISMX vs. WGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FISMX
Fidelity International Small Cap Fund
6.71%24.73%0.05%19.62%-16.66%13.44%9.98%21.45%-16.08%31.58%
WGROX
Wasatch Core Growth Fund
1.09%-10.37%13.13%33.43%-30.86%20.76%36.73%33.31%-3.75%24.29%

Correlation

The correlation between FISMX and WGROX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2002

0.60

The correlation between FISMX and WGROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FISMX vs. WGROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FISMX
FISMX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

WGROX
WGROX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
WGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
WGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FISMX vs. WGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) and Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FISMXWGROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.98

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

-0.26

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.89

-0.66

+5.55

FISMX vs. WGROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FISMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the WGROX Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FISMX and WGROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FISMXWGROXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

-0.22

+1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.02

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.45

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.55

+0.18

Drawdowns

FISMX vs. WGROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FISMX drawdown since its inception was -60.94%, roughly equal to the maximum WGROX drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FISMX and WGROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FISMXWGROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.94%

-61.61%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-15.89%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.70%

-27.61%

+14.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-40.16%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.80%

-40.16%

+1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.19%

-17.99%

+13.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-9.90%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

6.34%

-3.34%

Volatility

FISMX vs. WGROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity International Small Cap Fund (FISMX) is 4.04%, while Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that FISMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FISMXWGROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

5.59%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

14.21%

-3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.47%

19.18%

-6.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.61%

23.01%

-9.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.07%

23.33%

-9.26%

FISMX vs. WGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FISMX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than WGROX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

FISMX vs. WGROX - Dividend Comparison

FISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than WGROX's 8.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISMX
Fidelity International Small Cap Fund
3.36%3.58%2.64%1.87%0.70%7.28%0.83%2.32%6.14%2.46%2.70%2.80%
WGROX
Wasatch Core Growth Fund
8.46%8.55%9.22%0.00%0.71%16.82%7.21%10.73%10.14%6.24%0.15%12.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


FISMX and WGROX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WGROX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to FISMX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FISMX dropped -60.94% vs WGROX's -61.61%.

FISMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FISMX and WGROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer