FIQWX vs. QBDSX
FIQWX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class Z) and QBDSX (Quantified Managed Income Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FIQWX returned 7.77%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for QBDSX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIQWX charges 0.59%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for QBDSX.
Performance
FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIQWX achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's -0.63% return.
FIQWX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 23.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- —
QBDSX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- -0.63%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- 0.50%
- 3Y*
- 2.61%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 0.73%
FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQWX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class Z | 13.33% | 13.09% | 7.76% | 9.60% | -9.79% | 19.14% | 11.40% | 22.61% | -7.06% |
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | -0.63% | 5.11% | 1.02% | 2.25% | -4.09% | -0.66% | -9.22% | 10.50% | -1.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIQWX and QBDSX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2018 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, FIQWX and QBDSX have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIQWX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank
FIQWX
QBDSX
FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class Z (FIQWX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIQWX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.02 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 0.08 | +3.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.50 | 0.20 | +16.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIQWX drawdown since its inception was -30.01%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQWX and QBDSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIQWX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.01% | -18.38% | -11.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.78% | -3.09% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.51% | -3.76% | -11.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.02% | -7.40% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -8.64% | +8.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -6.85% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 1.23% | +0.15% |
Volatility
FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class Z (FIQWX) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 0.86%. This indicates that FIQWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIQWX | QBDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.51% | 0.86% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.52% | 2.44% | +4.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.44% | 3.64% | +4.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 4.31% | +6.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 5.26% | +8.37% |
FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIQWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison
FIQWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, more than QBDSX's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQWX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class Z | 7.15% | 8.05% | 1.79% | 5.83% | 4.35% | 8.55% | 5.79% | 6.81% | 6.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QBDSX Quantified Managed Income Fund | 4.50% | 4.47% | 3.98% | 4.51% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 0.87% | 2.26% | 2.04% | 2.51% | 1.00% | 3.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIQWX and QBDSX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIQWX has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to QBDSX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQWX dropped -30.01% vs QBDSX's -18.38%.
FIQWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIQWX and QBDSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer