PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIQWX vs. QBDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class Z (FIQWX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIQWX achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's -0.63% return.


FIQWX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.46%
YTD
13.33%
6M
12.53%
1Y
23.53%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*

QBDSX

1D
-0.25%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
-1.31%
1Y
0.50%
3Y*
2.61%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
0.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIQWX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class Z
13.33%13.09%7.76%9.60%-9.79%19.14%11.40%22.61%-7.06%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
-0.63%5.11%1.02%2.25%-4.09%-0.66%-9.22%10.50%-1.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FIQWX and QBDSX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2018

0.51

Over the past year, FIQWX and QBDSX have become more correlated (0.72) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIQWX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIQWX
FIQWX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FIQWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIQWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIQWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FIQWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIQWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

QBDSX
QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class Z (FIQWX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIQWXQBDSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.02

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

0.08

+3.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.50

0.20

+16.30

FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIQWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the QBDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIQWX and QBDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIQWX drawdown since its inception was -30.01%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQWX and QBDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIQWXQBDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.01%

-18.38%

-11.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

-3.09%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.51%

-3.76%

-11.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.02%

-7.40%

-9.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-8.64%

+8.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-6.85%

+3.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

1.23%

+0.15%

Volatility

FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class Z (FIQWX) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 0.86%. This indicates that FIQWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIQWXQBDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

0.86%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

2.44%

+4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.44%

3.64%

+4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.11%

4.31%

+6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

5.26%

+8.37%

FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIQWX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIQWX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison

FIQWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, more than QBDSX's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIQWX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class Z
7.15%8.05%1.79%5.83%4.35%8.55%5.79%6.81%6.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
4.50%4.47%3.98%4.51%0.54%0.71%0.87%2.26%2.04%2.51%1.00%3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIQWX and QBDSX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIQWX has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to QBDSX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQWX dropped -30.01% vs QBDSX's -18.38%.

FIQWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIQWX and QBDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer