FIQCX vs. BAICX
FIQCX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z) and BAICX (BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, FIQCX returned 9.32%/yr vs 3.71%/yr for BAICX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FIQCX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for BAICX.
Performance
FIQCX vs. BAICX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIQCX achieves a 13.25% return, which is significantly higher than BAICX's 3.77% return.
FIQCX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- YTD
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 24.97%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.32%
- 10Y*
- —
BAICX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 3.77%
- YTD
- 3.77%
- 1Y
- 8.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 5.15%
FIQCX vs. BAICX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z | 13.25% | 20.94% | 12.67% | 19.15% | -18.53% | 17.26% | 19.45% | 26.32% | -9.86% |
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | 3.77% | 11.53% | 7.19% | 9.24% | -12.42% | 6.61% | 6.34% | 13.61% | -3.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIQCX and BAICX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between FIQCX and BAICX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIQCX vs. BAICX — Risk / Return Rank
FIQCX
BAICX
FIQCX vs. BAICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) and BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIQCX | BAICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 1.75 | +0.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.74 | 7.52 | +4.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIQCX vs. BAICX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIQCX drawdown since its inception was -30.97%, smaller than the maximum BAICX drawdown of -33.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQCX and BAICX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIQCX | BAICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.97% | -33.29% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.34% | -5.00% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.35% | -5.85% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.94% | -17.64% | -8.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -0.19% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -3.72% | -1.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.16% | +1.01% |
Volatility
FIQCX vs. BAICX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio (BAICX) at 2.06%. This indicates that FIQCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIQCX | BAICX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 2.06% | +3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 4.70% | +6.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.26% | 5.53% | +7.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 6.32% | +8.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 6.05% | +10.65% |
FIQCX vs. BAICX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIQCX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than BAICX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIQCX vs. BAICX - Dividend Comparison
FIQCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than BAICX's 6.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAICX BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Portfolio | 6.40% | 6.26% | 5.85% | 4.20% | 4.21% | 4.90% | 4.07% | 4.69% | 5.28% | 4.60% | 4.71% | 5.34% |
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z | 5.07% | 5.74% | 3.61% | 1.43% | 5.21% | 3.30% | 2.07% | 5.66% | 5.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIQCX and BAICX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIQCX has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to BAICX (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQCX dropped -30.97% vs BAICX's -33.29%.
FIQCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIQCX and BAICX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer