FIQCX vs. TSAIX
FIQCX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z) and TSAIX (TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FIQCX returned 10.18%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for TSAIX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FIQCX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for TSAIX.
Performance
FIQCX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIQCX achieves a 14.29% return, which is significantly higher than TSAIX's 10.50% return.
FIQCX
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 14.29%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 30.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.18%
- 10Y*
- —
TSAIX
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 6M
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
FIQCX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z | 14.29% | 20.94% | 12.67% | 19.15% | -18.53% | 17.26% | 19.45% | 26.32% | -9.86% |
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | 10.50% | 20.04% | 15.46% | 22.72% | -19.57% | 17.10% | 19.69% | 27.97% | -11.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIQCX and TSAIX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.98 |
The correlation between FIQCX and TSAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIQCX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank
FIQCX
TSAIX
FIQCX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIQCX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.35 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 2.58 | +0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.24 | 11.06 | +3.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIQCX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIQCX drawdown since its inception was -30.97%, smaller than the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIQCX and TSAIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIQCX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.97% | -34.58% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.34% | -10.28% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.35% | -17.29% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.94% | -28.28% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.12% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -4.90% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.38% | -0.23% |
Volatility
FIQCX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z (FIQCX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) have volatilities of 5.48% and 5.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIQCX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 5.38% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | 11.28% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.09% | 13.69% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 16.38% | -1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 17.70% | -0.99% |
FIQCX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIQCX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIQCX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison
FIQCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than TSAIX's 6.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIQCX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% Fund Class Z | 5.02% | 5.74% | 3.61% | 1.43% | 5.21% | 3.30% | 2.07% | 5.66% | 5.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | 6.68% | 7.38% | 2.94% | 1.81% | 9.27% | 11.82% | 5.59% | 5.71% | 5.71% | 1.13% | 4.12% | 7.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, FIQCX and TSAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIQCX has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to TSAIX (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIQCX dropped -30.97% vs TSAIX's -34.58%.
FIQCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIQCX and TSAIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer