PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIPFX vs. FRQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIPFX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIPFX achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than FRQIX's 3.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FIPFX has outperformed FRQIX with an annualized return of 11.81%, while FRQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.95% annualized return.


FIPFX

1D
-0.78%
1M
3.73%
YTD
11.54%
6M
12.20%
1Y
27.03%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
11.81%

FRQIX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.99%
YTD
3.78%
6M
4.08%
1Y
9.65%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
2.77%
10Y*
4.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIPFX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIPFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class
11.54%21.40%14.15%19.91%-18.22%15.93%16.46%26.02%-7.28%20.54%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.78%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.58%12.63%-2.84%10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FIPFX and FRQIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2009

0.89

The correlation between FIPFX and FRQIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (5 years) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIPFX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIPFX
FIPFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FIPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FIPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQIX
FRQIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FRQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIPFX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIPFXFRQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.49

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.97

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.57

12.67

+0.90

FIPFX vs. FRQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIPFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the FRQIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIPFX and FRQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIPFXFRQIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.45

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.50

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.93

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.56

+0.16

Drawdowns

FIPFX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIPFX drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, smaller than the maximum FRQIX drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIPFX and FRQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIPFXFRQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.71%

-38.01%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-3.43%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.71%

-5.21%

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.20%

-17.04%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.71%

-17.04%

-13.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.26%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-4.43%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

0.80%

+1.23%

Volatility

FIPFX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) at 1.67%. This indicates that FIPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIPFXFRQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

1.67%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.33%

3.41%

+5.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

4.16%

+7.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

5.56%

+8.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

5.33%

+9.84%

FIPFX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIPFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIPFX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison

FIPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than FRQIX's 3.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIPFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class
1.76%1.97%2.00%1.94%2.02%1.93%1.95%15.16%2.28%2.05%2.09%2.00%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.04%3.14%2.97%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.51%3.14%5.60%16.32%2.43%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIPFX and FRQIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIPFX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to FRQIX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIPFX dropped -30.71% vs FRQIX's -38.01%.

FRQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIPFX and FRQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer