PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIPFX vs. FIHFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIPFX vs. FIHFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIPFX achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly higher than FIHFX's 8.68% return. Over the past 10 years, FIPFX has outperformed FIHFX with an annualized return of 11.91%, while FIHFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.41% annualized return.


FIPFX

1D
1.23%
1M
1.94%
YTD
11.90%
6M
11.77%
1Y
27.81%
3Y*
18.17%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
11.91%

FIHFX

1D
0.95%
1M
1.66%
YTD
8.68%
6M
8.67%
1Y
21.01%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIPFX vs. FIHFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIPFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class
11.90%21.40%14.15%19.91%-18.22%15.93%16.46%26.02%-7.28%20.54%
FIHFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class
8.68%17.32%11.22%17.25%-17.49%13.73%15.54%24.87%-6.77%20.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FIPFX and FIHFX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2009

1.00

The correlation between FIPFX and FIHFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIPFX vs. FIHFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIPFX
FIPFX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FIPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FIPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FIHFX
FIHFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FIHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FIHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIPFX vs. FIHFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIPFXFIHFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.98

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.20

12.73

+0.47

FIPFX vs. FIHFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIPFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FIHFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIPFX and FIHFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIPFX vs. FIHFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIPFX drawdown since its inception was -30.71%, which is greater than FIHFX's maximum drawdown of -28.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIPFX and FIHFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIPFXFIHFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.71%

-28.42%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-6.99%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.71%

-10.98%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.20%

-24.84%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.71%

-28.42%

-2.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.28%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-3.98%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.63%

+0.45%

Volatility

FIPFX vs. FIHFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class (FIPFX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class (FIHFX) at 3.88%. This indicates that FIPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIHFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIPFXFIHFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

3.88%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

7.87%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

9.38%

+2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.52%

11.99%

+2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%

13.40%

+1.83%

FIPFX vs. FIHFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FIPFX and FIHFX have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FIPFX vs. FIHFX - Dividend Comparison

FIPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than FIHFX's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIHFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2035 Fund Investor Class
2.56%2.77%2.50%2.10%2.14%1.93%2.15%16.14%2.21%1.81%1.95%2.03%
FIPFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2050 Fund Investor Class
1.76%1.97%2.00%1.94%2.02%1.93%1.95%15.16%2.28%2.05%2.09%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FIPFX and FIHFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIPFX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to FIHFX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIPFX dropped -30.71% vs FIHFX's -28.42%.

FIPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIPFX and FIHFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer