FIPDX vs. FTIHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX).
FIPDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 16, 2012. FTIHX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI (All Country World Index) ex USA Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016.
Performance
FIPDX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIPDX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIPDX Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 0.33% | 6.90% | 2.00% | 3.77% | -12.09% | 5.94% | 10.90% | 8.32% | -1.37% | 2.98% |
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund | -1.15% | 32.59% | 4.98% | 15.49% | -16.29% | 8.45% | 11.09% | 21.50% | -14.40% | 25.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIPDX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly higher than FTIHX's -1.15% return.
FIPDX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- 2.58%
FTIHX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -11.11%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- 1Y
- 24.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIPDX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIPDX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FIPDX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank
FIPDX
FTIHX
FIPDX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIPDX | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.47 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 1.97 | -0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.30 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 1.92 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | 7.63 | -3.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIPDX | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.47 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.45 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.54 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIPDX and FTIHX is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FIPDX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison
FIPDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than FTIHX's 2.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIPDX Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 4.16% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 3.56% | 8.87% | 4.76% | 1.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 1.29% | 1.34% | 0.38% |
FTIHX Fidelity Total International Index Fund | 2.82% | 2.78% | 2.88% | 2.78% | 2.51% | 2.55% | 1.62% | 2.61% | 2.21% | 0.45% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FIPDX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIPDX drawdown since its inception was -14.32%, smaller than the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIPDX and FTIHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIPDX | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.32% | -35.75% | +21.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.90% | -11.25% | +8.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.32% | -29.99% | +15.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -11.25% | +9.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -7.31% | +2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 2.84% | -1.92% |
Volatility
FIPDX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) is 1.37%, while Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that FIPDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIPDX | FTIHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 7.05% | -5.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.35% | 10.67% | -8.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.13% | 15.82% | -11.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.99% | 15.03% | -9.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 16.00% | -10.62% |