FINX vs. PAVE
FINX (Global X FinTech ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FINX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global FinTech Thematic Index, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FINX returned -10.20%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for PAVE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FINX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
FINX vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FINX achieves a -16.28% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 19.88% return.
FINX
- 1D
- -4.72%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- -16.28%
- 6M
- -18.85%
- 1Y
- -20.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.77%
- 5Y*
- -10.20%
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 37.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- —
FINX vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FINX Global X FinTech ETF | -16.28% | -5.20% | 23.02% | 33.15% | -51.80% | -9.65% | 53.76% | 37.52% | 0.82% | 36.79% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 19.88% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 14.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between FINX and PAVE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between FINX and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FINX vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FINX
PAVE
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FINX
PAVE
Financial Services
FINX
PAVE
-
Industrials
FINX
PAVE
Healthcare
FINX
PAVE
-
Basic Materials
FINX
-
PAVE
Communication Services
FINX
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
FINX
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
FINX
-
PAVE
Energy
FINX
-
PAVE
Real Estate
FINX
-
PAVE
-
Utilities
FINX
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FINX vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
FINX
PAVE
FINX vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FinTech ETF (FINX) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FINX | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.34 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 3.13 | -3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | 11.50 | -12.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FINX | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | 1.99 | -2.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | 0.81 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.68 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
FINX vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FINX drawdown since its inception was -63.53%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINX and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FINX | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.53% | -44.08% | -19.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.58% | -11.91% | -24.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.58% | -26.23% | -10.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.53% | -26.23% | -37.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.93% | -1.82% | -48.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.45% | -6.24% | -18.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.98% | 3.24% | +15.74% |
Volatility
FINX vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
Global X FinTech ETF (FINX) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 6.42%. This indicates that FINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FINX | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 6.42% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.78% | 15.17% | +7.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.36% | 18.84% | +10.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.40% | 21.60% | +9.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.73% | 24.38% | +4.35% |
FINX vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FINX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
FINX vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
FINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than PAVE's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FINX Global X FinTech ETF | 0.69% | 0.58% | 0.72% | 0.21% | 0.27% | 5.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.11% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FINX and PAVE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FINX has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to PAVE (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FINX dropped -63.53% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.39% vs -10.20% for FINX. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.39% return vs -10.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for FINX.
PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.69% for FINX.
FINX is categorized as Technology Equities, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. FINX tracks Indxx Global FinTech Thematic Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for FINX and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FINX and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer