FINT vs. SCHF
FINT (Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. FINT is actively managed, while SCHF is passively managed. Over the past year, FINT returned 31.76% vs 32.67% for SCHF. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FINT charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
FINT vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FINT having a 14.98% return and SCHF slightly higher at 15.56%.
FINT
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 14.98%
- 6M
- 17.18%
- 1Y
- 31.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHF
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 18.62%
- 1Y
- 32.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
FINT vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF | 14.98% | 29.12% | -0.15% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 15.56% | 34.55% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FINT and SCHF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FINT and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FINT vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
FINT
SCHF
FINT vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FINT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.37 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 2.86 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.35 | 11.11 | +1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FINT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.09 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.99 | 0.44 | +1.56 |
Drawdowns
FINT vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FINT drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, smaller than the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINT and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FINT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.64% | -34.87% | +21.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -11.48% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -0.86% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.54% | -7.38% | +5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.95% | -0.37% |
Volatility
FINT vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) is 4.92%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that FINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FINT | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 5.66% | -0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.83% | 13.34% | -1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 15.74% | -1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 16.39% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 17.18% | -1.28% |
FINT vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FINT has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
FINT vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
FINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than SCHF's 2.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF | 1.91% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.96% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FINT and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHF has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to FINT (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FINT dropped -13.64% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 1-year performance, SCHF leads with 32.67% vs 31.76% for FINT. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 32.67% return vs 31.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FINT.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 1.91% for FINT.
They also come from different issuers: Frontier and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FINT and 0.06% for SCHF.
FINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FINT and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer