FINT vs. SCHF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FINT (Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. FINT is actively managed, while SCHF is passively managed. Over the past year, FINT returned 29.01% vs 31.49% for SCHF. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FINT charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.

Performance

FINT vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FINT having a 14.92% return and SCHF slightly higher at 15.34%.

FINT

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.20%
• 6M: 7.99%
• YTD: 14.92%
• 1Y: 29.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 27.01%

SCHF

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 8.27%
• YTD: 15.34%
• 1Y: 31.49%
• 3Y*: 19.29%
• 5Y*: 9.97%
• 10Y*: 10.16%
• ALL TIME*: 7.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF	$83.75K	$95.10K	$235.84K
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	$217.84M	$219.61M	$214.32M

FINT vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF	14.92%	29.12%	-0.77%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	15.34%	34.55%	0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FINT and SCHF is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024	0.95

The correlation between FINT and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FINT vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FINT

FINT Risk / Return Rank: 75
FINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FINT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FINT Martin Ratio Rank: 77

SCHF

SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 78
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FINT vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FINT	SCHF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.82	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.50	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.33	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	2.75	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.76	10.23	+0.53

FINT vs. SCHF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the SCHF Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FINT and SCHF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FINT vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINT drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, smaller than the maximum SCHF drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINT and SCHF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FINT	SCHF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.64%	-34.87%	+21.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.08%	-11.48%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.41%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.45%	-1.99%	+0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.61%	-7.33%	+5.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	3.09%	-0.39%

Volatility

FINT vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) is 4.63%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that FINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FINT	SCHF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	5.37%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.55%	15.41%	-1.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.43%	17.38%	-1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	16.70%	-0.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	17.06%	-0.82%

FINT vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FINT has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

FINT vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison

FINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than SCHF's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF	1.87%	2.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	3.06%	3.42%	3.26%	2.97%	2.80%	3.19%	2.08%	2.95%	3.06%	2.35%	2.58%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FINT and SCHF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, FINT and SCHF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FINT or SCHF?

SCHF has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to FINT (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FINT dropped -13.64% vs SCHF's -34.87%.

Which ETF is better, FINT or SCHF?

On 1-year performance, SCHF leads with 31.49% vs 29.01% for FINT. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FINT or SCHF?

Over the 1-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 31.49% return vs 29.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FINT or SCHF?

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FINT or SCHF?

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 1.87% for FINT.

What is the main difference between FINT and SCHF?

They also come from different issuers: Frontier and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FINT and 0.06% for SCHF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.