FINT vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FINT (Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Frontier, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. FINT is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, FINT returned 31.76% vs 1800.91% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. FINT charges 0.90%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

FINT vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FINT achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 875.88% return.

FINT

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 4.34%
• YTD: 14.98%
• 6M: 17.18%
• 1Y: 31.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 4.26%
• 1M: 9.15%
• YTD: 875.88%
• 6M: 735.56%
• 1Y: 1,800.91%
• 3Y*: 129.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FINT vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF	14.98%	29.12%	-0.15%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	875.88%	96.22%	-2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FINT and BWET is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2024	-0.06

Return for Risk

FINT vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FINT

FINT Risk / Return Rank: 68
FINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FINT Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FINT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FINT vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FINT	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	18.57	-16.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	6.55	-3.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.96	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	59.51	-56.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.35	158.07	-145.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FINT vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FINT Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 18.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FINT and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FINT	BWET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	18.57	-16.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.99	1.90	+0.09

Drawdowns

FINT vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINT drawdown since its inception was -13.64%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINT and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	FINT	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.64%	-56.90%	+43.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.08%	-30.64%	+20.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-11.29%	+10.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.54%	-24.09%	+22.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.58%	11.51%	-8.93%

Volatility

FINT vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF (FINT) is 4.92%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that FINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FINT	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	33.96%	-29.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.83%	88.49%	-76.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.98%	98.35%	-84.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.90%	70.45%	-54.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.90%	70.45%	-54.55%

FINT vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

FINT has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FINT vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

FINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%
FINT Frontier Asset Total International Equity ETF	1.91%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FINT and BWET in my portfolio?

FINT and BWET have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FINT or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to FINT (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FINT dropped -13.64% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, FINT or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1800.91% vs 31.76% for FINT. On fees, FINT is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, FINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FINT or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1800.91% return vs 31.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FINT or BWET?

FINT is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FINT or BWET?

FINT has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between FINT and BWET?

FINT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Frontier and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for FINT and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.57 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.