PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIMKX vs. FKEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIMKX vs. FKEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I (FIMKX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIMKX achieves a 33.74% return, which is significantly higher than FKEMX's 28.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FIMKX has outperformed FKEMX with an annualized return of 13.29%, while FKEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.50% annualized return.


FIMKX

1D
2.01%
1M
13.68%
YTD
33.74%
6M
37.66%
1Y
70.40%
3Y*
29.11%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
13.29%

FKEMX

1D
1.68%
1M
9.77%
YTD
28.27%
6M
30.74%
1Y
58.68%
3Y*
23.94%
5Y*
7.50%
10Y*
12.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIMKX vs. FKEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I
33.74%40.06%9.31%8.44%-19.82%-2.63%30.43%29.75%-18.06%46.67%
FKEMX
Fidelity Emerging Markets K
28.27%31.18%7.26%15.36%-27.42%1.40%32.68%33.86%-17.92%46.97%

Correlation

The correlation between FIMKX and FKEMX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2008

0.97

The correlation between FIMKX and FKEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIMKX vs. FKEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIMKX
FIMKX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FIMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FIMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FKEMX
FKEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FKEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FKEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIMKX vs. FKEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I (FIMKX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIMKXFKEMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.94

3.12

+0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.86

3.93

+0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.56

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.16

4.55

+0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.06

17.22

+3.84

FIMKX vs. FKEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIMKX Sharpe Ratio is 3.94, which is comparable to the FKEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIMKX and FKEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIMKXFKEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.94

3.12

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.40

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.67

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.24

+0.22

Drawdowns

FIMKX vs. FKEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIMKX drawdown since its inception was -69.98%, roughly equal to the maximum FKEMX drawdown of -69.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIMKX and FKEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIMKXFKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.98%

-69.07%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.72%

-13.00%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-19.08%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-40.79%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.85%

-43.13%

+1.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.86%

-21.30%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

3.42%

-0.07%

Volatility

FIMKX vs. FKEMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I (FIMKX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) have volatilities of 7.87% and 7.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIMKXFKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.87%

7.93%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.44%

16.07%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.00%

18.96%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

18.94%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.81%

18.69%

+0.12%

FIMKX vs. FKEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIMKX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FKEMX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIMKX vs. FKEMX - Dividend Comparison

FIMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than FKEMX's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I
1.18%1.57%1.20%1.60%1.14%5.19%2.09%10.86%0.61%0.10%0.45%0.19%
FKEMX
Fidelity Emerging Markets K
0.05%0.07%0.78%1.24%0.89%6.18%1.46%1.85%1.00%0.08%0.84%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FIMKX and FKEMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FKEMX has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to FIMKX (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIMKX dropped -69.98% vs FKEMX's -69.07%.

FIMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 3.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIMKX and FKEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer