FIMKX vs. FEMKX
FIMKX (Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I) and FEMKX (Fidelity Emerging Markets) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FIMKX returned 13.36%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for FEMKX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FIMKX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FEMKX.
Performance
FIMKX vs. FEMKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIMKX achieves a 31.36% return, which is significantly higher than FEMKX's 28.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FIMKX having a 13.36% annualized return and FEMKX not far behind at 12.71%.
FIMKX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 31.36%
- 6M
- 32.55%
- 1Y
- 64.18%
- 3Y*
- 28.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
FEMKX
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 8.03%
- YTD
- 28.98%
- 6M
- 30.23%
- 1Y
- 55.93%
- 3Y*
- 23.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.71%
FIMKX vs. FEMKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I | 31.36% | 40.06% | 9.31% | 8.44% | -19.82% | -2.63% | 30.43% | 29.75% | -18.06% | 46.67% |
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets | 28.98% | 31.02% | 7.12% | 15.16% | -27.48% | 1.25% | 32.56% | 33.67% | -18.03% | 46.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIMKX and FEMKX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2004 | 0.98 |
The correlation between FIMKX and FEMKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIMKX vs. FEMKX — Risk / Return Rank
FIMKX
FEMKX
FIMKX vs. FEMKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I (FIMKX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIMKX | FEMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.49 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.73 | 4.36 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.18 | 15.55 | +2.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIMKX vs. FEMKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIMKX drawdown since its inception was -69.98%, roughly equal to the maximum FEMKX drawdown of -71.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIMKX and FEMKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIMKX | FEMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.98% | -71.14% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.72% | -13.00% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -19.13% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.53% | -40.88% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.85% | -43.24% | +1.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | 0.00% | -1.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.82% | -25.91% | +6.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 3.64% | -0.08% |
Volatility
FIMKX vs. FEMKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I (FIMKX) is 10.57%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets (FEMKX) has a volatility of 11.80%. This indicates that FIMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEMKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIMKX | FEMKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.57% | 11.80% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.91% | 19.26% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.06% | 21.64% | -1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 19.49% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 18.96% | +0.05% |
FIMKX vs. FEMKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIMKX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMKX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIMKX vs. FEMKX - Dividend Comparison
FIMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than FEMKX's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 0.77% | 6.00% | 1.39% | 1.71% | 0.83% | 0.08% | 0.67% | 0.51% |
FIMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class I | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.20% | 1.60% | 1.14% | 5.19% | 2.09% | 10.86% | 0.61% | 0.10% | 0.45% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FIMKX and FEMKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FEMKX has higher volatility (11.80%) compared to FIMKX (10.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIMKX dropped -69.98% vs FEMKX's -71.14%.
FIMKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIMKX and FEMKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer