FILFX vs. GSIMX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FILFX (Strategic Advisers International Fund) and GSIMX (Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FILFX returned 8.70%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for GSIMX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FILFX charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for GSIMX.

Performance

FILFX vs. GSIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FILFX achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly higher than GSIMX's 3.65% return.

FILFX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 11.70%
• 6M: 11.52%
• 1Y: 25.86%
• 3Y*: 17.82%
• 5Y*: 8.70%
• 10Y*: 10.51%

GSIMX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -4.59%
• YTD: 3.65%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 9.87%
• 3Y*: 15.56%
• 5Y*: 8.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FILFX vs. GSIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FILFX Strategic Advisers International Fund	11.70%	30.56%	4.79%	18.21%	-17.44%	10.82%	14.90%	24.04%	-15.25%	26.24%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	3.65%	20.85%	9.66%	22.10%	-11.06%	12.50%	15.77%	27.64%	-6.04%	29.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FILFX and GSIMX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between FILFX and GSIMX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FILFX vs. GSIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FILFX

FILFX Risk / Return Rank: 53
FILFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FILFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
FILFX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FILFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
FILFX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

GSIMX

GSIMX Risk / Return Rank: 16
GSIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
GSIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
GSIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
GSIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GSIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FILFX vs. GSIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FILFX	GSIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	1.07	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	1.49	+1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.20	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	1.35	+1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.08	4.15	+5.93

FILFX vs. GSIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FILFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the GSIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FILFX and GSIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FILFX vs. GSIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FILFX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, which is greater than GSIMX's maximum drawdown of -28.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILFX and GSIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FILFX	GSIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.75%	-28.84%	-31.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.19%	-7.81%	-3.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.60%	-10.32%	-3.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.88%	-25.37%	-8.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.24%	+6.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.34%	-4.81%	-8.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	2.53%	+0.29%

Volatility

FILFX vs. GSIMX - Volatility Comparison

Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund (GSIMX) at 2.83%. This indicates that FILFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FILFX	GSIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.02%	2.83%	+2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.74%	8.21%	+4.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.57%	9.89%	+5.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.48%	14.37%	+2.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	15.67%	+0.84%

FILFX vs. GSIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FILFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIMX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

FILFX vs. GSIMX - Dividend Comparison

FILFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, more than GSIMX's 4.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FILFX Strategic Advisers International Fund	9.46%	7.33%	3.91%	2.45%	4.58%	8.87%	1.75%	3.26%	6.71%	3.13%	2.16%	3.21%
GSIMX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund	4.94%	5.12%	11.18%	2.36%	4.89%	2.23%	0.18%	0.65%	0.53%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FILFX and GSIMX in my portfolio?

FILFX and GSIMX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FILFX or GSIMX?

FILFX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to GSIMX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FILFX dropped -60.75% vs GSIMX's -28.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FILFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.