PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FILFX vs. FSELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FILFX vs. FSELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FILFX achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly lower than FSELX's 85.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FILFX has underperformed FSELX with an annualized return of 9.62%, while FSELX has yielded a comparatively higher 39.21% annualized return.


FILFX

1D
0.54%
1M
4.55%
YTD
10.08%
6M
12.83%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
9.62%

FSELX

1D
6.35%
1M
26.53%
YTD
85.56%
6M
83.27%
1Y
166.37%
3Y*
68.85%
5Y*
46.95%
10Y*
39.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FILFX vs. FSELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FILFX
Strategic Advisers International Fund
10.08%30.56%4.79%18.21%-17.44%10.82%14.90%24.04%-15.25%26.24%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
85.56%52.17%49.68%78.49%-35.27%59.16%44.33%64.50%-12.01%34.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FILFX and FSELX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2006

0.64

The correlation between FILFX and FSELX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FILFX vs. FSELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FILFX
FILFX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FILFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FILFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FILFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FILFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FILFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FSELX
FSELX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FSELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSELX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FILFX vs. FSELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) and Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FILFXFSELXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

5.35

-3.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

5.23

-2.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.71

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

12.18

-9.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.87

46.77

-37.90

FILFX vs. FSELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FILFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the FSELX Sharpe Ratio of 5.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FILFX and FSELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FILFXFSELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

5.35

-3.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

1.21

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

1.12

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.55

-0.23

Drawdowns

FILFX vs. FSELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FILFX drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, smaller than the maximum FSELX drawdown of -82.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FILFX and FSELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FILFXFSELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.75%

-82.54%

+21.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.19%

-14.38%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.60%

-36.31%

+22.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.88%

-46.37%

+12.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.88%

-46.37%

+12.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-28.70%

+15.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.74%

-0.81%

Volatility

FILFX vs. FSELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strategic Advisers International Fund (FILFX) is 4.97%, while Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) has a volatility of 12.01%. This indicates that FILFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FILFXFSELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

12.01%

-7.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

25.42%

-13.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

32.74%

-17.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

38.97%

-22.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

35.07%

-18.55%

FILFX vs. FSELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FILFX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than FSELX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FILFX vs. FSELX - Dividend Comparison

FILFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, more than FSELX's 8.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FILFX
Strategic Advisers International Fund
9.60%7.33%3.91%2.45%4.58%8.87%1.75%3.26%6.71%3.13%2.16%3.21%
FSELX
Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio
8.83%11.11%7.97%7.20%6.69%6.99%8.13%3.36%26.80%14.44%3.82%15.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FILFX and FSELX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSELX has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to FILFX (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FILFX dropped -60.75% vs FSELX's -82.54%.

FSELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FILFX and FSELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer