PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIKWX vs. CSTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIKWX vs. CSTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z (FIKWX) and American Funds College 2027 Fund (CSTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIKWX achieves a 6.11% return, which is significantly higher than CSTAX's 1.38% return.


FIKWX

1D
0.67%
1M
1.33%
YTD
6.11%
6M
6.21%
1Y
14.18%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*

CSTAX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.38%
6M
1.52%
1Y
6.38%
3Y*
6.72%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
4.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIKWX vs. CSTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIKWX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z
6.11%11.32%6.32%9.85%-12.27%6.13%11.12%13.47%-4.14%
CSTAX
American Funds College 2027 Fund
1.38%9.00%5.57%6.57%-9.87%6.52%7.66%13.35%-3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKWX and CSTAX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018

0.88

The correlation between FIKWX and CSTAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIKWX vs. CSTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIKWX
FIKWX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FIKWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CSTAX
CSTAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CSTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CSTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIKWX vs. CSTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z (FIKWX) and American Funds College 2027 Fund (CSTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIKWXCSTAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.41

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

2.39

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.93

9.06

+4.87

FIKWX vs. CSTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the CSTAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKWX and CSTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIKWX vs. CSTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKWX drawdown since its inception was -16.51%, which is greater than CSTAX's maximum drawdown of -14.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKWX and CSTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIKWXCSTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.51%

-14.52%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.32%

-2.72%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.00%

-4.89%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.51%

-14.52%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.48%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-2.34%

-1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.72%

+0.29%

Volatility

FIKWX vs. CSTAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z (FIKWX) has a higher volatility of 2.53% compared to American Funds College 2027 Fund (CSTAX) at 1.22%. This indicates that FIKWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIKWXCSTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

1.22%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.92%

2.47%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.80%

3.13%

+2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.56%

5.17%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.85%

5.79%

+1.06%

FIKWX vs. CSTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKWX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSTAX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIKWX vs. CSTAX - Dividend Comparison

FIKWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than CSTAX's 5.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSTAX
American Funds College 2027 Fund
5.19%5.26%3.78%3.17%3.40%7.52%5.72%4.00%4.78%3.90%4.34%4.49%
FIKWX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z
2.79%2.84%3.12%2.82%4.95%1.90%2.28%3.31%2.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIKWX and CSTAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIKWX has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to CSTAX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKWX dropped -16.51% vs CSTAX's -14.52%.

FIKWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIKWX and CSTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer