FIKWX vs. FSIRX
FIKWX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z) and FSIRX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FIKWX returned 3.91%/yr vs 5.54%/yr for FSIRX. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FIKWX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSIRX.
Performance
FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIKWX achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly lower than FSIRX's 7.04% return.
FIKWX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 10.46%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.61%
FSIRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 1Y
- 13.22%
- 3Y*
- 8.16%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- 5.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKWX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z | 4.77% | 11.32% | 6.32% | 9.85% | -12.27% | 6.13% | 11.12% | 13.47% | -4.14% |
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I | 7.04% | 10.38% | 5.83% | 4.58% | -3.34% | 15.89% | 3.72% | 10.55% | -5.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIKWX and FSIRX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FIKWX and FSIRX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIKWX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank
FIKWX
FSIRX
FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z (FIKWX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIKWX | FSIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.49 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 3.61 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 11.63 | -1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIKWX drawdown since its inception was -16.51%, smaller than the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKWX and FSIRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIKWX | FSIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.51% | -33.39% | +16.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.32% | -3.53% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.00% | -5.81% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.51% | -12.82% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -2.28% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -4.15% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 1.09% | -0.03% |
Volatility
FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z (FIKWX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) have volatilities of 1.71% and 1.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIKWX | FSIRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.71% | 1.75% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.12% | 3.98% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.99% | 5.07% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.61% | 6.93% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.83% | 6.75% | +0.08% |
FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIKWX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison
FIKWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than FSIRX's 3.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKWX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z | 2.30% | 2.84% | 3.12% | 2.82% | 4.95% | 1.90% | 2.28% | 3.31% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSIRX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I | 3.23% | 4.72% | 4.80% | 5.28% | 7.33% | 5.37% | 2.23% | 3.09% | 9.42% | 2.63% | 2.37% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIKWX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSIRX has higher volatility (1.75%) compared to FIKWX (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKWX dropped -16.51% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.
FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIKWX and FSIRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer