PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIKWX vs. FSIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z (FIKWX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIKWX achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly lower than FSIRX's 7.04% return.


FIKWX

1D
0.76%
1M
-0.90%
6M
3.07%
YTD
4.77%
1Y
10.46%
3Y*
8.55%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.61%

FSIRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.75%
6M
3.41%
YTD
7.04%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
5.47%
ALL TIME*
4.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIKWX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z
4.77%11.32%6.32%9.85%-12.27%6.13%11.12%13.47%-4.14%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
7.04%10.38%5.83%4.58%-3.34%15.89%3.72%10.55%-5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FIKWX and FSIRX is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between FIKWX and FSIRX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIKWX vs. FSIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIKWX
FIKWX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FIKWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FSIRX
FSIRX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FSIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z (FIKWX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIKWXFSIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.49

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

3.61

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.68

11.63

-1.95

FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIKWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the FSIRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIKWX and FSIRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIKWX drawdown since its inception was -16.51%, smaller than the maximum FSIRX drawdown of -33.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIKWX and FSIRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIKWXFSIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.51%

-33.39%

+16.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.32%

-3.53%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.00%

-5.81%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.51%

-12.82%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-2.28%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-4.15%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.09%

-0.03%

Volatility

FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z (FIKWX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I (FSIRX) have volatilities of 1.71% and 1.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIKWXFSIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

1.75%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.12%

3.98%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.99%

5.07%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.61%

6.93%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.83%

6.75%

+0.08%

FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIKWX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIKWX vs. FSIRX - Dividend Comparison

FIKWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than FSIRX's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKWX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% Fund Class Z
2.30%2.84%3.12%2.82%4.95%1.90%2.28%3.31%2.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSIRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class I
3.23%4.72%4.80%5.28%7.33%5.37%2.23%3.09%9.42%2.63%2.37%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIKWX and FSIRX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSIRX has higher volatility (1.75%) compared to FIKWX (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIKWX dropped -16.51% vs FSIRX's -33.39%.

FSIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIKWX and FSIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer